The MLP Arena

Pony Talk => Off Topic => The Dollhouse => Topic started by: Dragonflitter on March 06, 2014, 07:54:04 AM

Title: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Dragonflitter on March 06, 2014, 07:54:04 AM
I found this interesting article today about a new doll with the proportions of an average American 19-year-old female. Well worth the read, I think!

http://www.buzzfeed.com/alisonvingiano/this-barbie-doll-has-the-porportions-of-an-average-american
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: NoDivision on March 06, 2014, 08:30:04 AM
I saw this too. I think she looks really cute! I hope he's successful.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: anthologia on March 06, 2014, 08:31:29 AM
Kinda tempted to buy... Glad to see he's funded!
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: little.fox on March 06, 2014, 09:03:31 AM
I think this is such a beautiful initiative, and about time! I love this guys outlook, I do hope Lammily is a success! (not sure about the name tho)
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Galactica on March 06, 2014, 09:19:14 AM
I do remember this coming up a while back-  I love the idea of it although I think they would do better if they had cuter clothing (which I think is what kids focus on)

Love the jointed ankles
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Doedeardarling on March 06, 2014, 09:21:32 AM
Looks nice, though I'm not sure how much it really matters what dolls look like. I think it's the real life people that mostly affect kids and their body picture.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: melodys_angel on March 06, 2014, 10:16:41 AM
Ill be interested in seeing what results pop up.

unfortunately, ill have to agree with real people affecting kids though.

The amount of times ive heard my own grandmother say some not soo nice things when both my sister and I were average was insane..and I don't recall caring what Barbie looked like figure wise.  But that was the past..and this is now.  So we will see :)
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: little.fox on March 06, 2014, 10:41:45 AM
I don't think anyone is saying that kids' body image is based solely on dolls and toys, but as they are part of the world around us they will at least in part affect our ideals on some level, and I also believe there's been serious studies that have shown this to be the case.

Personally I think the key word is diversity. I think it's important to show young girls and boys that it's ok to be tall, short, skinny, curvy, blue eyed, have a wonky nose, whatever, as long as you are healthy. If dolls like this will affect 1 single child in a positive way, I think it's all worth it.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 06, 2014, 02:53:02 PM
Oh she looks much better than her first rendition.  I agree variation is great! 

I hope they don't really mean it when they say she's going to only dress in "normal" clothes like GAP.  She's never to wear anything goth, steampunk, never in clothing from the middle ages, princess, wild west and so on?  I guess I don't like the implication that liking things like that isn't normal. :P


Oh... I guess I'm referring to a slightly different article.

Quote
"Most fashion dolls on the market are dressed like princesses or wear funky outfits," Lamm told HuffPost. "I wanted Lammily to wear clothes that Gap or J. Crew might design. There's no reason why simple everyday clothes design can't be transferred to doll clothes."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/05/normal-barbie-kickstarter-nickolay-lamm-lammily-doll_n_4826502.html
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: DireRabbit on March 06, 2014, 03:09:37 PM
I very much like this! :lovey: But, however, I would love to see a series of dolls with many different body types as opposed to always average.

...Also, I'm concerned about whether or not the dolls would catch on. Right now nothing "jumps out" at me besides the normal proportions, and I don't think children value that near as much as adult collectors.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: papier on March 06, 2014, 03:20:16 PM
Oh she looks much better than her first rendition.  I agree variation is great! 

I hope they don't really mean it when they say she's going to only dress in "normal" clothes like GAP.  She's never to wear anything goth, steampunk, never in clothing from the middle ages, princess, wild west and so on?  I guess I don't like the implication that liking things like that isn't normal. :P


Oh... I guess I'm referring to a slightly different article.

Quote
"Most fashion dolls on the market are dressed like princesses or wear funky outfits," Lamm told HuffPost. "I wanted Lammily to wear clothes that Gap or J. Crew might design. There's no reason why simple everyday clothes design can't be transferred to doll clothes."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/05/normal-barbie-kickstarter-nickolay-lamm-lammily-doll_n_4826502.html


Yeah, and this is what will be the biggest barrier to its success.

Will this doll stand out among the myriad of fantastic, over-the-top doll lines that are out there right now? Is a little girl or boy going to pick this doll over a MH or a Disney Princess or an Equestria Girl? And the answer is: probably not.

If even Bratz is struggling to the point where the company puts it on hiatus for a year to get its proverbial shizz together, then how can this dowdy girl hope to compete? I'm all for different doll body types (although I hate the sense of righteousness these sorts of people seem to have, like they're saving people's children or something,) but ultimately it's a pointless gesture if the doll doesn't appeal to its target market.

eta: to clarify, her proportions are fine. That's not the problem. The problem is more with her image: will she stand out among the competition?
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 06, 2014, 03:44:10 PM
^ Agreed.  It will have the same problems as trying to make a "normal" toy for boys by eliminating themes like space warriors, dinosaur hunters, alien robots and so on.  Instead they'd get a regular man wearing gap clothes.  That might work for little boys and girls. Playskool range.  But I think older kids want themes that inspire them.

Or maybe it's because I've met people who really dislike fantasy of any sort.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Hervoyel on March 06, 2014, 03:46:12 PM
I think it's a nice idea, but I'm not a fan of marketing it as "normal" proportions, even if they do mean it in the statistical sense - because how is that empowering for people who don't match that "normal" doll either?

Quote
Looks nice, though I'm not sure how much it really matters what dolls look like. I think it's the real life people that mostly affect kids and their body picture.
I don't think the creator is labouring under the assumption that kids define themselves 100% (or even mostly) in comparison to toys, but when the toys are in line with other cultural assumptions and norms (beauty ads, celebrities, family pressures, and so on) they're still a part of the bigger cultural picture.

Material things are rarely the most important thing, but that doesn't make them unimportant, y'know?

Quote
It will have the same problems as trying to make a "normal" toy for boys by eliminating themes like space warriors, dinosaur hunters, alien robots and so on.  Instead they'd get a regular man wearing gap clothes.  That might work for little boys and girls. Playskool range.  But I think older kids want themes that inspire them.

Eh, it's one toy - I think they guy's goal is to have it out there as an alternative, not to turn every toy into this one's clone.  Surely there's room in a kid's playroom (or a collector's shelf) for this doll and Monster High, and Barbie, and disney princesses, and action dolls and any number of other toys.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Dragonflitter on March 06, 2014, 05:25:55 PM
eta: to clarify, her proportions are fine. That's not the problem. The problem is more with her image: will she stand out among the competition?

Good point. But perhaps she will stand out simply because she's the only one out there that isn't an over-the-top fantasy?


Material things are rarely the most important thing, but that doesn't make them unimportant, y'know?

Very wisely said!!
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: papier on March 06, 2014, 05:47:19 PM
eta: to clarify, her proportions are fine. That's not the problem. The problem is more with her image: will she stand out among the competition?

Good point. But perhaps she will stand out simply because she's the only one out there that isn't an over-the-top fantasy?

I think it's possible, but if she's going into the 'girl next door' doll bracket like Liv or Moxie Girls, she still needs to have some kind of 'wow' factor  - outstanding clothes, fun gimmicks, interesting back story - it must be an engaging brand.

So far the main focus of the doll is entirely on her proportions being more PC than Barbie's, but that stuff is there to please the parents, not the kids. What will the kids love about her?

I sincerely wish this guy well, but I hope he's not planning on her proportions being her only selling point. I'm guessing he's not that stupid, but this has been tried before, several times. Dolls like this come around every so often and they always fail.
Title: Re: The \\\'normal proportions\\\' doll
Post by: mistic_imp on March 06, 2014, 05:57:20 PM
I do remember this coming up a while back-  I love the idea of it although I think they would do better if they had cuter clothing (which I think is what kids focus on)

Love the jointed ankles

 i agree with this, she needs to have some funkier cuter clothes that are really " in " right now.  also varied hair styles, i think those things are really important in fashion dolls. I know clothes are half the reason I will pic up a doll LOL ( clothes and shoes)



Post Merge: March 06, 2014, 06:00:14 PM

or if they want to go with a more girl next door look, give her  some cool  professions  Kind of like they tried with some of the barbies..

Post Merge: March 06, 2014, 06:02:30 PM

Ill be interested in seeing what results pop up.

unfortunately, ill have to agree with real people affecting kids though.

The amount of times ive heard my own grandmother say some not soo nice things when both my sister and I were average was insane..and I don't recall caring what Barbie looked like figure wise.  But that was the past..and this is now.  So we will see :)

 agreed  def- real people  are not so nice, and have a HUGE impact on  Ones  self- esteem .

 dolls never effected  how i viewed my self..  growing up , I never compared my self to barbie,  only the  other  real life women and girls around me.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Strawberry Swirl on March 06, 2014, 06:04:51 PM
Cute as heck. You know what would be cool though?

Dolls with multiple body types. Fat ones, skinny ones, in between ones. YES.
Title: Re: The \'normal proportions\' doll
Post by: mistic_imp on March 06, 2014, 06:08:58 PM
Cute as heck. You know what would be cool though?

Dolls with multiple body types. Fat ones, skinny ones, in between ones. YES.

 i was just gonna mention this too!    becuase if they  really want to do well they shouldn't be says this  doll  is " normal"  body type.  that sort  of implies that other body types aren't..  they should make a line of  various body types,  to reflect everyone.

Post Merge: March 06, 2014, 06:13:08 PM


I hope they don't really mean it when they say she's going to only dress in "normal" clothes like GAP.  She's never to wear anything goth, steampunk, never in clothing from the middle ages, princess, wild west and so on?  I guess I don't like the implication that liking things like that isn't normal. :P

 i agree , and i really wish people would stop with the whole  " gap store " is considered normal clothes, where   princess, goth , steam punk  middle ages what ever is not.. clothes are just clothes,   people need to quit judging.


Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: MiRaja on March 06, 2014, 07:05:30 PM
I don't think anyone is saying that kids' body image is based solely on dolls and toys, but as they are part of the world around us they will at least in part affect our ideals on some level, and I also believe there's been serious studies that have shown this to be the case.

Personally I think the key word is diversity. I think it's important to show young girls and boys that it's ok to be tall, short, skinny, curvy, blue eyed, have a wonky nose, whatever, as long as you are healthy. If dolls like this will affect 1 single child in a positive way, I think it's all worth it.

Exactly.  It's a symptom and part of the problem.  Little girls are constantly bombarded by images of the unattainable.  These images and the way their presented is that if they don't look like that, they will never be successful, they will be considered ugly and they certainly won't be able to get a man. (!)

I've seen a lot of people go on and say it's just a toy and that the popularity of Barbie this and Barbie that proves that it's just a toy.  Barbie was only ever popular to begin with was because Mattel undercut every other doll company when they produced her.  She was the cheapest doll money could buy and Mattel is very much the reason why so many amazing doll companies went under.  American Character, Effanbee, Ideal, etc.  Mattel and Hasbro are one in the same of producing toys as cheap as possible and using overseas production to keep overhead to a minimum.  I would love it even more if Lammily were produced in the states. 

Prior to Barbie, dolls WERE much more realistically proportioned.  :/  And I'd like to see that return, as well as dolls produced with quality and being actually pretty without looking like they're wearing 2lbs of makeup.  Nevermind when I wear makeup I wear enough to put a drag queen to shame. . .  << >>

To me, it's proof positive our society has an issue with perception when I've seen countless people criticizing the Lammily doll and saying she's OBESE.  Are you kidding me?!  Sure, there are young girls who are skinnier than that, but that doll is not in the least obese.  To me, I think Barbie and other dolls who are obtainably thin are a gateway to low self-esteem and body dismorphia that is then compounded by the media such as the over abundance of photoshop on women to make them impossibly thin. 

By some of those comments, all of these dolls would be considered obese as well.  :/ 

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Stormness_1 on March 06, 2014, 08:07:28 PM
She'd sell if she had awesome accessories, like sportsy stuff (because she's articulated, how awesome!?) like team uniforms, raquets, ball, heck a HORSE would be awesome! She could fit into a car really well, and be part of a gazillion different playsets that all qualify as normal, but have her diversity be like that of barbie.

I had equestrian barbie & nibbles, workin out barbie, vet barbie and dozens of pets, bikini barbie, picnic barbie.... all normal things to do, but loads of fun scenarios for kids. You could even get her a gorgeous designer frock for valentines day, because normal people splurge now and then for a hot date, right?!

I like the doll, even though I'm not a doll person, but I would have way preferred her to barbie as a child - I always hated barbie's feet... urgh.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Vertefae on March 07, 2014, 12:29:58 AM
I'm not impressed. I think the only hearts dolls tried something similar at and failed miserably. I actually don't prefer her proportions either. Playtime is imagination and fantasy. I don't need normal Jane trying to rock it with the Monsters. I am also sort of sick of blaming dolls, toys, tv, games and music for all the ills of the world. People need to take responsibility for their own actions. Be a positive role model. Put others before yourselves. And stop demonizing everything you don't agree with.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: CupidStrikes on March 07, 2014, 12:50:30 AM
I hope he's successful! I do worry about the affect of dolls on little girls (and my dislike of them as a kid likely had a lot to do with that fact that none of them looked like me or were "interested" in things I liked) so I would love to see the success of a line of dolls that don't come in one or two skin and hair colours or one body type and that could include children with disabilities and illnesses, too.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: InkyMilk on March 07, 2014, 12:53:14 AM
I'm not impressed. I think the only hearts dolls tried something similar at and failed miserably. I actually don't prefer her proportions either. Playtime is imagination and fantasy. I don't need normal Jane trying to rock it with the Monsters. I am also sort of sick of blaming dolls, toys, tv, games and music for all the ills of the world. People need to take responsibility for their own actions. Be a positive role model. Put others before yourselves. And stop demonizing everything you don't agree with.

But isn't this man, and the people who support him, doing just that? Trying to put a little positivity out into the world about healthy body image in his own, unique way?

I'm kind of annoyed people are acting like this is a horrible idea because he hasn't created more dolls with more body types yet. If you read the article he does state that he DOES hope to create more dolls with more diversity in their skin tones and builds, but obviously just getting the funding for this one doll is going to take a lot of work since he can't just pull money out of nowhere. Maybe this doll's proportions don't apply to everyone, but she's WAY more realistic to a majority than Barbie ever will be, and as far as I'm concerned that is definitely a step in the right direction spreading positivity and healthy ideas to a new generation about the way they view their bodies.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Ringlets on March 07, 2014, 04:04:52 AM
I like the idea of something a bit different , and I like that its not another out of proportion skinny  fashion doll and the guy has good motives and would like to make more dolls with different shapes color etc to help kids self esteem and promote positivity about body shapes that arent super skinny  :bigups:  :lovey:
 
..... but gap clothes.. normal clothes.. Hmm.. problem with that it its boring for kids if thats all the types of clothes this doll would have. I personally was never into average looking, everyday clothes (I'm still not) :lookround:   Ordinary clothes are fine , but you need diversity in clothing types too - like some of the Barbies mentioned (eg: Vet barbie, Doctor barbie,  F1 barbie) or Pedigree Sindy doll from the 60's-80's was more normal , and you could get everyday clothes for her, but also more fashionable clothes, fantasy clothes, career clothes, sports clothes etc etc . For this to really take off this doll needs a really good range of outfits and accessories  :awake:
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: OLumeVaSti on March 07, 2014, 04:27:43 AM
They should make the abnormal proportion doll. They could use me as the model. Short, fat, and too much chest.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Hervoyel on March 07, 2014, 08:32:26 AM
I'm not impressed. I think the only hearts dolls tried something similar at and failed miserably.

Didn't those have weird cloth-over-wire bodies?  I think they might have been unpopular for reasons other than the intent behind the marketing.

Quote
I actually don't prefer her proportions either. Playtime is imagination and fantasy. I don't need normal Jane trying to rock it with the Monsters.

So don't buy the dude's dolls.  This is what I don't understand - this doll isn't replacing anything,  you can still rock your monsters -  it's just another option that'll be on the market for people who do want a "normal jane".  How is that not a good thing?  Personally, I like to see lots of different options, even if I'm not going to by them - and that can be this doll, president barbie, an anthro doll, a monster doll, or that doll with the crazy pooping unicorn accessory. 

And frankly, a creative kid (or collector) could easily make this "normal" (I'm not a fan of calling it "normal" myself, that strikes me as rather snarky on the part of the makers) doll into some fantasy character anyway. 

Quote
People need to take responsibility for their own actions.
This guy thought there was a gap in the market and produced a doll - if that's not taking responsibility, what is?  :huh:
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: MiRaja on March 07, 2014, 10:03:03 AM
I'm not impressed. I think the only hearts dolls tried something similar at and failed miserably. I actually don't prefer her proportions either. Playtime is imagination and fantasy. I don't need normal Jane trying to rock it with the Monsters. I am also sort of sick of blaming dolls, toys, tv, games and music for all the ills of the world. People need to take responsibility for their own actions. Be a positive role model. Put others before yourselves. And stop demonizing everything you don't agree with.

And stop demonizing everything you don't agree with. 

You should take your own advice.  I also don't like you saying that people who have anorexia or bulimia should take 'responsibility for their own actions.'  Which is what you're saying seems to come out and say.  No, the overly skinny dolls are not the sole cause for our little girls developing eating disorders earlier and earlier, but they are CERTAINLY REINFORCEMENT IN THE PROGRAMING OF LITTLE GIRLS TO THINK THAT BEING SKINNY IS EVERYTHING. 

I have an eating disorder, though I suffered mostly from the age of 12 to 17.  Twelve.  I was twelve.  I was not an adult, I was a child, and I had been conned by the world that I was disgusting and awful because I was 5'2 and weighed 142lbs.  Kids taunted me at school, I had my dad constantly calling me fat.  I was always into fashion design when I was younger and everything was about being thin.  Including my dolls.  I always used to think I wanted to look and be that skinny as a child EVER WHEN IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO ACHIEVE THOSE PROPORTIONS.  I get sick of people saying, "OH I GREW UP WITH THOSE TOYS AND I TURNED OUT FINE AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!"  Good for you!  You're not me and I'm not you.  And you're certainly not everyone either.  I look at my childhood drawings and it's really damn telling that there was something wrong with how I perceived the world and how I perceived bodies.  I remember I always tried to draw normal looking people, and I used to be artistic and what not, and while I'm nothing much now, I did have the spark so to say when I was younger, and I drew well for my age, except all the women I drew were impossibly thin!  Yet I know when I drew them that was never my intent!  I was trying to draw what a woman should look like, and when I initially drew them they did not look terribly skinny to me, yet now!  Oh my goodness!  It's scary! 


Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 07, 2014, 10:38:19 AM
I think people are annoyed by the doll because it seems to be attacking barbie and calling skinny people  unnatural or not-normal.  I'm glad people are looking for an alternative.  But introducing it by calling it "normal" or claiming that girls shouldn't have barbies because they're unhealthy is probably not the best way to win over people who like barbie.  Doubly so because people who like fashion dolls are the ones most likely to buy a doll like this.  I think they could just give her a name and some awesome outfits without all this hub bub and let people decide from there.

As a child, I wasn't interested in barbie or any doll with mature proportions.   I preferred fantasy and child-like like my little pony or Strawberry Shortcake or Charmkins. 
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: STLGusty on March 07, 2014, 12:14:49 PM
I think people are annoyed by the doll because it seems to be attacking barbie and calling skinny people  unnatural or not-normal.  I'm glad people are looking for an alternative.  But introducing it by calling it "normal" or claiming that girls shouldn't have barbies because they're unhealthy is probably not the best way to win over people who like barbie. 

I agree.  I think the basic concept of this doll is great in order to introduce more variety into the doll spectrum, but I think the ill feelings by some centers around it being called a "normal body."  I think the creator would have won over a lot more people if he would have omitted that word. 

By using the word "normal," it would now seem like anyone who is tall and thin should now be ashamed because they don't fit the mold of the "normal" doll...right (just playing devil's advocate here)?  Obviously I think that's a little adbsurd for anyone to feel that way over a doll, but if people feel justified thinking that way about Barbie's body, then they should also be able to think that way about this new doll's body.  It doesn't matter how you slice it, there's always going to be an unhappy party (who is usually an adult...because a lot of kids [in my opinion] don't really care too much)....so let's just leave out labels.  If I'm a child and I want to play with Barbie instead of this new doll, great.  If I'd rather play with the new doll instead of Barbie, splendid.  For me to say one is far superior than the other would be to undermine what the doll actually is...a toy for a child to play with - a toy a child can play with and use their IMAGINATION :)

I, personally, think it really IS just a doll (sorry lol).  I think she's cool because she is a different shape than what is usually released as a toy doll, but I think he's going to have a very hard time marketing them to children (as many have mentioned before) without an intriguing storyline, cartoon, awesome outfits, etc. That imagination factor needs to be there.

I was never really into dolls, but I did have a few Barbies.  Whenever I would play with them, they would go camping in the Barbie RV or Barbie Tent.  They would race their Barbie cars.  They would go hiking (through the living room).  I thought they were pretty, but I never said, "I want to look just like Barbie!"  I wanted to do the THINGS Barbie did.  I think the developer of this new doll needs to focus on developing what this doll will DO now that he has the design of the doll itself. 
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: InkyMilk on March 07, 2014, 12:32:35 PM
I think people are annoyed by the doll because it seems to be attacking barbie and calling skinny people  unnatural or not-normal.  I'm glad people are looking for an alternative.  But introducing it by calling it "normal" or claiming that girls shouldn't have barbies because they're unhealthy is probably not the best way to win over people who like barbie.  Doubly so because people who like fashion dolls are the ones most likely to buy a doll like this.  I think they could just give her a name and some awesome outfits without all this hub bub and let people decide from there.

As a child, I wasn't interested in barbie or any doll with mature proportions.   I preferred fantasy and child-like like my little pony or Strawberry Shortcake or Charmkins.

Well what's upsetting is that this new doll IS thin!! Honestly, look at her without standing next to Barbie and with some of her average clothing on and she really does look like a thin, real girl in the real world. She just isn't AS thin as Barbie who, as everyone knows given the mathematics behind her measurements, almost NO ONE in the world would be able to obtain. So no, this doll isn't saying thin people aren't normal or average or real, because this doll looks MORE like them than Barbie ever will. Maybe some girls don't have quite as much meat on them as this doll does, but she's still far more realistically proportioned to them than Barbie.

This doll IS healthy looking AND thin, just standing next to Barbie it's difficult to tell because Barbie is so disproportionally thin. I know what very thin women look like, and though they are thinner than the new doll, I have never in my life seen one who looks like Barbie without some sort of surgery involved.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 07, 2014, 01:25:39 PM
No she's "average"   ;)    I don't think she's fat at all.  But skinny is different than what's popularly considered healthy and normal.

I was very skinny as a teen, so was my sister.  Barbie had more flesh on her than we did (old barbie).  She was at least curvy.  We were always told we were too skinny and "not normal" even though we ate like horses.  We got teased for that.  Teased because we could pass as skinny boys.  Because we looked like sticks.  Because we must have anorexia, and unhealthy body image and all kinds of assumptions.  We started looking more "normal" in our 20s.  But I remember how upsetting it was for my sister.  I was never bothered as much.

But what I am saying is I don't think this group would go for a doll that looked like us when we were 19.  And it was already pointed out that they don't intend to make any dolls that are overweight.  I am happy and excited for the alternative but... less and less so that they are calling it "normal".   They really need to change that.  Honestly, why not just put the doll out there without any messages at all?  Lots of different sizes is fine but at this point, they seem to be saying "overweight" is bad, "too skinny" is bad.  It's just weird that's suppose to help body image.

https://stayathometrauma.wordpress.com/tag/skinny-girls/
^ this isn't my blog, but I thought it was good for perspective? 
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: InkyMilk on March 07, 2014, 02:29:19 PM
I'm not insensitive to the feelings of those who are naturally extremely thin. But again, I truly believe that this new doll has proportions that are much more realistic than Barbie. Take this new doll, shave her down and she will be much thinner, but her proportions will still never be as drastically ridiculous as Barbie's because Barbie was never meant to resemble a grand majority of real bodies, even the extremely thin.

Perhaps her being referred to as "normal"  is a faux pas, and I could see reason for calling her something different, but claiming that Barbie is MORE realistic for the very thin just seems extremely silly to me. Barbie has a very nipped in waist, true, some girls and women may find that more like themselves than this new doll, but again, going by the actual measurements of Barbie and comparing her to a real person....not realistic. At all. The claims are true that Barbie wouldn't even be able to hold herself up, much less walk, given the way she is built.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 07, 2014, 02:52:51 PM
Perhaps her being referred to as "normal"  is a faux pas, and I could see reason for calling her something different, but claiming that Barbie is MORE realistic for the very thin just seems extremely silly to me. Barbie has a very nipped in waist, true, some girls and women may find that more like themselves than this new doll, but again, going by the actual measurements of Barbie and comparing her to a real person....not realistic. At all. The claims are true that Barbie wouldn't even be able to hold herself up, much less walk, given the way she is built.

Oh, I was not claiming barbie is more realistic.  Just that the doll herself is being called "normal" which implies that not looking like that isn't normal.  They need better wording or something.

I can still see why some barbie fans are annoyed.  I don't think they claim that barbie is realistic either.  But not everyone had a negative body experience from barbie.  Some parents made sure to point out Barbie's unrealistic proportions, called their daughters beautiful, encouraged healthy eating and so on.  So to them, there seems to be some sort of implication that by liking barbie, they have body issues or cause them in other people.  And that's just the way the article is unfortunately worded.  It's kind of being run like a negative campaign against barbie.  And it just seems to be the wrong way to go about it because it's the fashion doll fans they're trying to win over and most of them probably like barbie.

To be fair to the doll creator, it might be that the news media is creating the controversy for more ad views.   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Vertefae on March 07, 2014, 03:13:31 PM
Wow. God forbid someone have a different opinion.

And I'm quite certain that people who are calling others fat or to skinny or what have you do far more damage than a TOY.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: Dragonflitter on March 07, 2014, 03:26:05 PM
And I'm quite certain that people who are calling others fat or to skinny or what have you do far more damage than a TOY.

I don't think the creator is labouring under the assumption that kids define themselves 100% (or even mostly) in comparison to toys, but when the toys are in line with other cultural assumptions and norms (beauty ads, celebrities, family pressures, and so on) they're still a part of the bigger cultural picture.

Material things are rarely the most important thing, but that doesn't make them unimportant, y'know?

(I can't say it any better, so I'm just going to quote Hervoyel again.)


On the other hand, I do agree that it would be detrimental to this person's cause if anyone felt bad because they didn't match the look of this 'normal-looking' doll. So I'm going to adjust the title of this thread accordingly.
Title: Re: The 'normal proportions' doll
Post by: andibgoode on March 07, 2014, 05:28:06 PM
Does anyone have a source for the creator himself using the word 'normal' - his site just says 'realistic' and 'average' but the Buzzfeed article linked quoted him as saying 'Normal Barbie', which, like everyone else bugs me because, well, what's 'normal', right?

I don't think this is perfect but I'm just excited to see something a bit different. No idea how children will respond.

I definitely agree with everyone who has said that dolls/toys are part of the problem but it is a wider cultural problem that includes all media. We don't live in a vacuum and the things around us definitely affect how we see ourselves and the rest of the world. I mean, I don't think Barbie had a negative effect on me but I'm not everyone, and my experiences don't invalidate anyone else's. I am also in my late 20s, now. I have no idea what it's like to be a child or young teen these days

Cute as heck. You know what would be cool though?

Dolls with multiple body types. Fat ones, skinny ones, in between ones. YES.

Yes! I think he is planning to do that, and skin colours, too. So, hopefully Lammily (not keen on the name but never mind) is successful enough that he can produce a really diverse line of dolls.

I backed the project and ordered 2 dolls - maybe I'll turn one into me...
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 07, 2014, 06:02:21 PM
Yea... I do think the media is trying to pit people against each other.  CNN title their video as "Anti-Barbie crowd-funded in 24 hours". 

The media says you're not allowed to like both. No way.  :P
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: kCherry on March 07, 2014, 06:16:35 PM
Dropping an early warning; keep it civil, lovies. -Cherry
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: PinkRosedust on March 07, 2014, 09:09:24 PM
Well, she's cute and it's a nice thought, but I still love my Barbies. And various other dolls with ridiculous proportions.

I remember playing with those Little Tikes family dolls when I was REALLY young, and it doesn't get much more plain or normal or average looking than them, but after a certain age I moved on to Barbies and other more cartoonish style dolls exclusively. At that point (maybe 5 years old?) I think I would have gone with the more over the top Barbies rather than a plain looking doll like this any day.

Honestly I'd love to see a chubby fashion doll.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: cobalte on March 08, 2014, 05:35:15 AM
It's a step in the right direction, but I agree with others in this topic who have said the product itself focuses too much on 'realistic body proportions' as opposed to something that will really push a kid to think it's a fun toy (whether that be articulation or interesting fashions).
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Dragonflitter on March 08, 2014, 06:17:40 AM
Yea... I do think the media is trying to pit people against each other.  CNN title their video as "Anti-Barbie crowd-funded in 24 hours". 

The media says you're not allowed to like both. No way.  :P

Interesting point! It wouldn't surprise me at all that the media would spin it a different way than the creator intended/presented. They'll say whatever they want to get people to read their articles and talk about it.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Winter Bones on March 08, 2014, 10:38:17 AM
I remember when I was a kid sometime in the late 90's/early 2000's, any time I walked down the pink aisle all I saw was Barbie, Barbie, Barbie, Polly Pocket, Barbie, as well as the occasional baby doll that peed or robotic animal. I'm not sure whether it was the fault of the market or where I lived (or the fact that I was only ever allowed near a toy section during Christmas or my birthday) but nowadays when I venture down there I see Barbie, Bratz, Monster High, EAH, Pinkie Cooper, Novi Starz, Polly Pocket, Lalaloopsy, La Dee Da, the list goes on.

Play dolls aren't really my thing, but I'm glad there's so much differentiation in the fashion doll market, and I like that this girl is being released for the simple fact that she's different as well. I do agree that most kids (child me included) don't have much of an interest in 'average' since they see that all the time, so I hope they at least release her with some cool clothes or play sets or give her some cool jobs. Zoo Doctor Lammily, Olympic Speed Skater Lammily, Ballerina Lammily, Motocross Lammily. Or maybe not. I'm not the best at marketing to little girls. :P
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: CrystalJapan on March 08, 2014, 06:05:53 PM
I like the Idea of Lammily, and i honestly would like her concept to be pushed forward, maybe in a more American girls format where there is a girl like you.
I'll keep my thoughts about how i really don't like Lammily itself to myself though.
However i do think the whole thing is going to be a flop if the Lammily brand doesn't step it up and get some distinguishing kind of gimmick sometime soon or it'll fall to the wayside with it's target demographic.

I know i can't say the same for everyone but i liked barbie because because she was a time traveling rock and roll star in outer space, hell i love novi stars because they are so out there with their looks and colours, and this was before i knew about the webisodes!

 i feel like lammily is going to be drowned out after the initial hype by other doll lines if she only has "i look like a average person" gimmick.

also, does anyone else think that Lammily is going to end up having a really small closet? interchanging clothes might be really tricky.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Taxel on March 08, 2014, 06:45:36 PM
As a collector, I don't like her. The Exclusive First Edition outfit is cute, but her other outfits are extremely boring. Her jointed ankles and seemingly rubber legs (and arms?) are really off-putting to me. There's also something about her face that I don't quite like.

But as a parent, I really like her. The rubber limbs are still off-putting, since I remember how much I struggled to dress rubber-legged dolls as a child. But I definitely agree that her boring clothes will be her biggest downfall. Unless they introduce interesting outfits I really don't think she'll succeed even though I'd love to see more diversity and realistic dolls on store shelves. A wide range of well-made clothes is also a must since she'll probably struggle to share clothes with other dolls (which of course is also an issue as a collector). Some Barbie-sized clothes might fit them, but who knows.

The young girls I know, one is 8ish and one is 4, like interesting clothes. Princess dresses, sparkly musician outfits, etc. One of my poor Moxie Girlz got bashed by the eight year old for her boring clothes when we played dolls together. If she was given Lammily, she'd think she's boring and has boring/ugly clothes. The four year old probably wouldn't really play with or like her because she doesn't have a princess dress.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Marionette on March 08, 2014, 10:15:56 PM
I certainly wouldn't want to see one body type being praised over another, but I'd just like to remind people... Barbie's body is unrealistic, fullstop. Today's Barbie is a bit more realistic (in that I can believe she might even be able to survive if you scaled her up and made her a real person), but this is a pretty recent thing... her proportions used to be inhuman. That is to say, impossible for any real human to have. Monster High, Bratz, and so forth are even less realistic. They are very stylized, accentuating large bust and hips and teeny, tiny waists, in line with our society's idealized body type yet taking it even further.

I don't want to see the Lammily effort degrade into body-shaming for any girl. It would make me very sad. The fact is, though, very, veeery few fashion dolls have a body type that is even viable in real life, much less a common body type. Calling her "normal" is not the right choice of words, and I hope (if that's the word they've been using) they ditch it, but "realistic"? Yes. And while dolls do not necessarily have to be realistic, just remember that we have unrealistic dolls in spades. Like I said, most fashion dolls are stylized to an impossible level. The problem is not that any given doll's figure is unrealistic but that almost all dolls are unrealistic. The problem is that there really is no realistic doll to turn to. That it's not even a choice for a parent or a little girl to have a doll like this. And that's why Lammily is important, especially with plans for a wider variety of body types in the future. More options are always better!

But, like others, I see flaws here. Because the Barbie/Monster High body type is the one people are accustomed to, it's going to be an uphill battle to begin with. Obviously a good number of parents are won over since the doll was successfully crowd-funded, but a playline toy isn't worth much if it can't keep a child's interest. Right now, she seems awfully plain. She feels like, well, like a generic Barbie with a different body type. That isn't what makes for a lasting doll line.

Though I don't think she must suddenly become Fairy Princess Lammily (our over-reliance on princesses as role models for little girls has its issues as well), there are definitely ways to make your doll appealing without going that route. There's not a single princess in Monster High, is there (I guess you could say Cleo :P)? What she needs is a wide variety of colorful, relevant, detailed fashions that catch the eye. In the end, a fashion doll is exactly that -- a vehicle for fashions. She needs outfits that lend themselves to vivid scenarios and encourage roleplay, too. Girls need to both be able to identify with Lammily and to use her to act out roles they admire.

I'll definitely keep my eye on Lammily though... hopefully the plainness is more of a prototype thing and we'll see higher quality, more eye-catching outfits and scenarios in the future. :)
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: ZennaBug on March 09, 2014, 11:14:19 AM
I like the concept.  I hope they do introduce more different body types, though I do like that they are focusing on healthy bodies.  But some tall dolls, short dolls, thin dolls, curvy dolls, and dolls of different ethnicity would be nice.  I had Barbies as a kid and never felt like I should look like her (my friends and I used to laugh at how ridiculous her body was), but a positive body image toy can't be a bad thing.  I don't think she's the prettiest doll I've ever seen, but I like her in concept.  If they can really work to diversify the dolls themselves and come up with some cool outfits (because let's face it, dressing up your dolls is the most fun part), then I think this could be a successful idea.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Marionette on March 09, 2014, 05:39:01 PM
Exactly. She needs some pizazz in her outfits because, at the end of the day, she's a fashion doll. Kids who play with them are kids who have an interest in fashion and/or in roleplay. That is what is needed for this doll to be successful, because she has no other gimmick. She's not a monster, princess, or whatever else, and that's perfectly fine, but that means she's missing an angle that Monster High and Disney Princess have. They can make her a soccer player, a gardener, an artist, a musician, whatever -- things real kids are! But they need to give her detailed and colorful outfits that appeal to children, along with accessories that will make roleplay fun. I also am excited to see them expand body types and ethnicities as these are also really important things if a girl is to have a doll she can identify with more, as is one of the goals here.

My personal wish... make the darn girl fully articulated! xD Then I'd probably buy them myself. As a collector I'm just really picky about dolls with knee and elbow joints because I wanna pose them. :P I'm not sure how much this matters to kids... probably not as much as to me, haha.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 09, 2014, 06:28:17 PM


I thought I remembered other dolls like this:

There was Emme
http://naturallybeautifulwomen.com/tag/emme-doll/

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=126339

And happy to be me
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/15/garden/she-s-no-barbie-nor-does-she-care-to-be.html

And Friends of Barbie
http://www.amazon.com/Rosie-ODonnell-Friend-Barbie-Doll/dp/B00001R3WC



Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: lovesbabysquirmy on March 09, 2014, 08:25:43 PM
The double-edged sword of fashion dolls is that they are an expression of fantasy.  Everyone knows, for example, that Barbie's chest size is unrealistic - but media outlets peddle the notion as desirable.  The reason that one desires a fantastical scenario -such as looking like Barbie or defining oneself and self-image by that standard - are because they are fantasy. 

As Mr. Spock put it, "You may find that having is not so pleasing a thing as wanting."  :D

I don't particularly find this doll appealing, so there is no need to add her to my shelf.  I agree that she needs way cooler clothes - match her with a basic hand-held sewing machine and it would be great, but not this boring, everyday doll.  :(
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Marionette on March 09, 2014, 08:35:35 PM
I'd never heard of Emme or Happy to Be Me. Emme is really cute... and articulated! :o Looking at her prices, I thought she couldn't be playline though, and it turns out she isn't. She's a collector's doll, so the demographic is a bit different (more targeted at adults and older kids who collect, not young kids who play).

The Happy to Be Me dolls are underwhelming though. They still look fairly Barbie-like to me, and they also make the mistake of rather boring clothes. Seeing as I've never heard of 'em, and they don't seem to still be made either, they seem to have not made much of a splash. This is exactly the road I hope Lammily doesn't go down.

That Rosie doll is a collector's doll too, and I think it might be a one-off sculpt, just used for Rosie.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 10, 2014, 09:20:43 AM
Actually, there was an Emme playline.  She was shown at the 2003 Toy Fair.

http://collectdolls.about.com/library/weekly/aa021903a.htm

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-02-20/features/0202200086_1_emme-robert-tonner-doll

http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20020407&slug=wemmedoll07


And I also found, "Get Real Dolls".
http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/08/10/get-real-girls-dolls-girls-didnt-really-get-them/

ok... I might want one of these. How cool!
http://www.behance.net/gallery/STARTUP-GET-REAL-GIRL-ACTION-DOLL-LINE/3590013





Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Marionette on March 11, 2014, 04:44:45 AM
Oh, that's interesting about Emme. I can't seem to find either collector or playline doll to purchase, which makes me a bit sad, but it'd probably cost too much for my taste anyway. xD

Woah, those Get Real dolls are cute! I want them now! @A@ Nakia especially. It is so, so hard to find a fully articulated 1/6 doll I like in a darker skintone that I actually like. I tend to like Japanese companies like Obitsu and Volks, and they just don't make 'em at all. I get sad when there's not a variety in my collection and I'm not able to make the characters I want to make. Unfortunately, they look a little too rare for me to want to customize, cruising ebay, but they're pretty cute as they are.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Sunshine on March 11, 2014, 06:20:51 AM
I'm not a doll person but I always love seeing people trying to... kind of "take down" the body image that Barbie puts out. Personally I never compared myself to a doll for body shape but I think all the "Real Body" dolls that have been posted here are truly lovely. If I had a kid who liked dolls I would definitely want to have her playing with "real" looking dolls like this versus Barbie. Also I really like the REASONS behind trying to make these types of dolls, it is true women in general and especially young girls suffer from bad body images, and anything positive that can show them that "size doesn't matter, size does not equal beauty" is really a positive thing I think! :biggrin:
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: little.fox on March 15, 2014, 06:45:08 AM
I am a bit perplexed as to why so many people seem to be against the idea of a doll that is supposed to promote self esteem in young people. Surely any attempt to improve the current state should be welcomed?

And as I said before, I don't think anyone is suggesting that Barbie is the root of all evil that ruins young girls lives, if you like Barbie and don't see a problem with her, that's fine, but when we are all bombarded with images of unattainable, photshopped "perfection" 24/7 from TV, films, games, magazine etc, I just don't think it's possible that it has no effect on us what so ever. I for one believe media has part of the responsibility here.

And as to those that take offense with the word "normal" in relation to Lammily, I haven't actually seen a quote from the creator using this term himself, I've only seen him state that she is average.

Of course it's impossible to manufacture one single doll that everyone will be able to idetinfy with physically, but as no-one alive will be able to identify fully with Barbie for example, (her measurements are literally impossible and most likely she wouldn't be fertile due to underweight, nor be able to stand up due to being top heavy and having unnaturally small feet) surely a doll like Lammily can only be an improvement.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Firecracker on March 15, 2014, 10:30:06 AM
I'm not against what Lamily stands for, I'm always for destroying the unreasonable views people have grown up with...  I find that Lamily's selling point by being average is just well, boring and not as marketable.  Unless she came with some fancy multi color outfit or something more exciting i can't say I would have even looked at her at all as a kid.
It's not the crazy proportions and other things that draw me to doll lines like monster high, it's the fact that they are many different color and monsters.  I'd love my monster dolls just as much if not more if they had less surreal figures.
I think that's why a lot of people are not loving Lamily.  If not for her body, why are we supposed to want her?
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 15, 2014, 02:03:58 PM
I am a bit perplexed as to why so many people seem to be against the idea of a doll that is supposed to promote self esteem in young people. Surely any attempt to improve the current state should be welcomed?

And as I said before, I don't think anyone is suggesting that Barbie is the root of all evil that ruins young girls lives, if you like Barbie and don't see a problem with her, that's fine, but when we are all bombarded with images of unattainable, photshopped "perfection" 24/7 from TV, films, games, magazine etc, I just don't think it's possible that it has no effect on us what so ever. I for one believe media has part of the responsibility here.

And as to those that take offense with the word "normal" in relation to Lammily, I haven't actually seen a quote from the creator using this term himself, I've only seen him state that she is average.

Of course it's impossible to manufacture one single doll that everyone will be able to idetinfy with physically, but as no-one alive will be able to identify fully with Barbie for example, (her measurements are literally impossible and most likely she wouldn't be fertile due to underweight, nor be able to stand up due to being top heavy and having unnaturally small feet) surely a doll like Lammily can only be an improvement.


http://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2006/04/19/post-1/

Well, this is the study results that suggests Barbie effects 1st graders self esteem.  But her grip seems to loosen with 2nd graders.  But the odd thing is that Emme effects 2nd graders even more and she is suppose to be the more realistic body.

I'm not sure what is going on with that because it doesn't answer a question.  It just creates more.  Why the drop with 2nd graders?  Why the increase with Emme?  And most importantly, why do some little girls seem to be not bothered by either doll?  That's the question I think will help girls the most.

Based on this, a doll like Lammily is not only not going to solve the problem, she can contribute to it just as much.  I don't know why.  But that looks to be the case.

My only guess is that maybe some little girls get more positive feedback about themselves than other girls do.  Maybe some are told how unrealistic Barbie is, that no one can look like that and they don't worry about it any more.  But perhaps getting the idea, "this is how you might really look and this is a standard of beauty you can live up to" could make them even more self-conscience.  After all, as little girls, they don't look anything like that and they have no idea if they ever will.  They don't even know what body type they will be.  But that's just my speculation.  The study only proves that dolls of any shape can cause many girls to not like their bodies.  That's it.

I don't think Lammily is bad at all and if kids want her, that's great.  But I don't really think she's healthier for body image. Not according to the study.  Whatever it is that makes little girls ignore Barbie and other dolls as body role models, that's the key.  That's what we really need to know.


Quote
http://www.elle.com/news/culture/lammily-real-barbie-nickolay-lamm

It’s sort of surprising that you're a male and you're making this product. You don't have daughters, either. What's the genesis?


I was reading something on the Internet, and I remember a commenter that kind of read my mind. I think it was on Huff Post. On some story, he posted a comment that said something like 'To the male, to me, Barbie…she kind of looks alien-like.' And that's what sparked it. I agree. If Barbie were a real woman, she'd be intimidating and cold, and what I like about real women is that they're warm and friendly. I just wanted to create an image that would reflect that.
Get that? Real women are warm and friendly. Not intimidating.    :P






Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Shiromisa on March 15, 2014, 02:55:23 PM
Ha, Brightberry, I was just thinking about that quote! Thank you, I'm on my phone and couldn't find it. It seems like he hasn't quite...thought this one through, you know? Like he's thought as far as "I want to make a doll that appeals to me as an adult male," without taking into account what kids want (vets and princesses and other cool story-ready things like that). I'm not sure this idea is ready for primetime.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Aerora on March 15, 2014, 08:28:57 PM
Honestly the thing that bugs me most is... the creator doesn't have a physical prototype. Yet he says he'll be able to ship out, what, thousands of dolls within the year?

(And also, yeah, I love the idea of dolls with actual body type variation! Just... that probably isn't enough to sell a line all on its own, especially in the fashion doll world.)
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: little.fox on March 16, 2014, 05:34:00 AM
brightberry, that is very interesting indeed, and I do agree that we need to find out more about what impact (and why) toys have on kids, but this is just one single study, it doesn't neccesarily prove anything.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: MiRaja on March 16, 2014, 11:21:22 AM

It’s sort of surprising that you're a male and you're making this product. You don't have daughters, either. What's the genesis?[/b]

I was reading something on the Internet, and I remember a commenter that kind of read my mind. I think it was on Huff Post. On some story, he posted a comment that said something like 'To the male, to me, Barbie…she kind of looks alien-like.' And that's what sparked it. I agree. If Barbie were a real woman, she'd be intimidating and cold, and what I like about real women is that they're warm and friendly. I just wanted to create an image that would reflect that.
Get that? Real women are warm and friendly. Not intimidating.    :P
[/quote]

Clearly he's never met me. 

Anyways, I'm with Fox and what she has to say.  I've said it thrice, I believe, but no, Barbie is not the root of it all.  But she is a contributing factor and I love the word Fox said.  Bombarded.  That's exactly it, and I'm tired of the responses from people saying that OH NO, they've never been effected by this at all, but then say that the Lammily doll is simply average proportion and that Barbie's body is actually attainable.  Read:  It isn't.  No real person can look that way.  Our perception of the human body is so incredibly warped by the media these days it isn't even funny.  We see in magazines the same sort of Barbie bodies and we completely accept these bodies as real when in fact the photoshopper has taken 3-4 inches off her waist, stretched her torso, stretched her thighs and thinned those out, along with her shins too, thinned her arms ( can't have any bingo wings, now can we?! ) and also lengthened her neck. 

I am a long time sufferer of body dismorphia.  These images, these crazily thin dolls, they affected me.  I was constantly told I was too fat and by being too fat I wasn't good enough.  I was told from this by the media, kids at school, even my family.  My whole worth completely hinged on my weight and I am totally sick and tired of the continual defense of the unattainable.  The defense of it being fantasy is beginning to sound a bit old hat, too.  Is it a good fantasy for a child to have of having a body of a woman suffering from severe anorexia?  I mean that Monster High Doll whose body is actual bones?  Not cool, not cool at all in my opinion, not when so many of our women are suffering from a disease that leaves them looking little more like a bag of bones.  There is no attack on people who are thin.  The Lammily doll is not by any means fat, or even not-skinny.  Those proportions are based on the average teenage girl who is still generally pretty skinny.  Those proportions are still of a girl who wears a size 2-6.  If you wear a size 2-6 you are still skinny.  Goodness. 

And I am not even saying the Lammily doll is the answer.  I'm of the mind that his project will probably never come to fruition.  As others have said, he has no physical prototype.  All of the dolls shown are renderings.  They are not of a real doll.  I'm not sure how they're going tackle the logistics of all the joints in her body, if they're going to take a page out of vintage vinyl dolls for the knee joints and elbow joints where there is a hard plastic mechanism covered with a soft vinyl sleeve so that the dolls arms and legs are 'seamless.' . .   That is not an easy thing to mock up, but it has been done.  In all actuality, Lamily's body reminds me sort of Sweet Sue Sophisticate made in the 1960's.  She had jointed ankles that could switch from flats, ballet slippers to high heels.  It was actually quite neat. 

If it was up to me, I'd have dolls back to the way these used to be.  Not any sort of rose-tinted spectacles, but dolls in the past were done so much better.  I'm sick of the Barbie-doll that's really more an action figure than an actual doll.  :p  Larger dolls, with more complex costumes, with joints and open and close eyes.  Clothing that's made like real people's clothing, with the jewelry having just as much attention to detail as what a real person would wear.  I'm just so tired of everything so mass-produced to boot with all the unattainable images of 'beauty.'  Everything that's out now is just so ugly and cheap to me, sorry to say, and I know there are a lot of people who collect these new dolls, and if that's what you enjoy, I'm glad someone can, but I can't.  I'm really of the mind that I would prefer to spend a lot of money on one doll than buy a bunch for very little money.  Quality > Quantity. 

And I've rambled once again. 
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: tinyblondie on March 16, 2014, 11:48:09 AM
I think she is lovely. I hope that she does well, I would like to see different versions of her too featuring various ethnicities, body types and heights  ^.^
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 16, 2014, 02:31:04 PM
Quote
That's exactly it, and I'm tired of the responses from people saying that OH NO, they've never been effected by this at all, but then say that the Lammily doll is simply average proportion and that Barbie's body is actually attainable.  Read:  It isn't.

I don't think anyone on this thread has said barbie's body is attainable... or in any of the articles linked.   So maybe you're getting that somewhere else?  The study does show that some little girls are not affected by barbie, so people saying they weren't here isn't really strange.  Especially if they are adults and still like dolls.  For whatever reason, some people are not influenced and that's interesting.

Quote
brightberry, that is very interesting indeed, and I do agree that we need to find out more about what impact (and why) toys have on kids, but this is just one single study, it doesn't necessarily prove anything.

Right. It doesn't prove much.  It does indicate that barbie influences many girls at least after a short time of experiencing barbie and that's why the study gets quoted so often in these lammily articles.  But in the same study more "average" dolls also negatively influenced girls, even more so than barbie in the 2nd grade.  I find it mildly annoying now to read articles that produce the study as evidence that barbie is bad for girls and lammily is good when the same study indicates that other mature dolls are just as problematic.  But I guess that's what the news does.   >_<

I think whatever parents are doing to make sure that their girls have a healthy attitude towards dolls... they should figure out what that is and write a book about it.

I don't remember ever wanting to look like barbie.  I actually kind of dreaded growing up. :P 
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: little.fox on March 16, 2014, 03:08:03 PM
I agree, if we could find out what those parents are doing right, that would be a huge step in the right direction!

Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Jocelyn on March 16, 2014, 09:02:57 PM
There is a blog/facebook page I follow that tries to do exactly that - Pigtail Pals and Ballcap Buddies. Though the mom behind it can be kind of, ah...aggressive at times - I think there was a thread here about a post she made against Monster High, back when MH was still in this forum. She is very much against the Barbie ideal and is all about raising girls to love their body, and all body types. And letting girls know that what you can do with your body is far more important than what it looks like. I'm not sure if people will agree with her completely, but she just came out with a book recently so I thought maybe I should throw the info out there.

Her book: http://www.amazon.com/Redefining-Girly-Stereotyping-Sexualizing-Girlhood/dp/1613745524/ and her blog: http://pigtailpalsblog.com/

I agree that while the idea behind Lammily is a good one, she's just too boring to appeal to kids. The creator seems very aware of what proactive mothers want for their kids, but he doesn't really seem to be factoring in what the kids want.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: SwordPony on March 16, 2014, 09:24:35 PM
That's the lady that likes to smack down anything that she doesn't like. I get trying to protect your child but this lady takes it to the extreme.

Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: MiRaja on March 16, 2014, 10:40:19 PM
Quote
That's exactly it, and I'm tired of the responses from people saying that OH NO, they've never been effected by this at all, but then say that the Lammily doll is simply average proportion and that Barbie's body is actually attainable.  Read:  It isn't.

I don't think anyone on this thread has said barbie's body is attainable... or in any of the articles linked.   So maybe you're getting that somewhere else?  The study does show that some little girls are not affected by barbie, so people saying they weren't here isn't really strange.  Especially if they are adults and still like dolls.  For whatever reason, some people are not influenced and that's interesting.

Quote
brightberry, that is very interesting indeed, and I do agree that we need to find out more about what impact (and why) toys have on kids, but this is just one single study, it doesn't necessarily prove anything.

Right. It doesn't prove much.  It does indicate that barbie influences many girls at least after a short time of experiencing barbie and that's why the study gets quoted so often in these lammily articles.  But in the same study more "average" dolls also negatively influenced girls, even more so than barbie in the 2nd grade.  I find it mildly annoying now to read articles that produce the study as evidence that barbie is bad for girls and lammily is good when the same study indicates that other mature dolls are just as problematic.  But I guess that's what the news does.   >_<

I think whatever parents are doing to make sure that their girls have a healthy attitude towards dolls... they should figure out what that is and write a book about it.

I don't remember ever wanting to look like barbie.  I actually kind of dreaded growing up. :P 


There are a couple people in this very thread that the Barbie physique, in their opinion is obtainable.  I'm not going to pick out any individuals or point fingers, but it's definitely has been said, and on the grounds that Mattel slightly tweaked the Barbie body in the last decade or so. 

And just because *you* didn't grow up to want to look like Barbie doesn't mean other little girls didn't or didn't internalize the fat shaming that happens in our society.  I've seen several people use that sort of anecdata, too, and some even more so.  Great, I say!  But the facts, not the anecdotes and personal experiences by a few people in a fandom, say that our young girls and young women are growing up with some very twisted and warped ideals of the human body.  Even though I think it's clear from SOME of the responses that the people who are saying they are not affected or weren't, clearly were/are affected by the warped ideals of beauty in our society and the strain it places on women's health. 

And it's one study that is casually saying that *some* are affected, which suggests that in the MINORITY some girls are not being affected while the majority is being affected by what media and corporations push as beauty and success. 
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 16, 2014, 10:55:51 PM
I'm certainly not denying that many girls are affected by barbie.  The study clearly shows that many are and that they are also affected by more realistic proportions on dolls.  But it also shows that some are not.  So wouldn't it be prudent to figure what it is that made that happen?


Oh Jocelyn... Thank you for the link.  I thought this entry was really interesting:
http://pigtailpalsblog.com/2014/02/reframe-the-campaign-barbie-sport-illustrated-and-your-daughter/#.UyaNnM40h8E

Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: tinyblondie on March 17, 2014, 04:35:25 AM
That's the lady that likes to smack down anything that she doesn't like. I get trying to protect your child but this lady takes it to the extreme.

She's made some very good points in the past but some terrible ones too. She once said that the G4 Ponies were sexualized, not even the EG dolls but the actual ponies  :what:

She seems to find fault with alot of things that arnt faulty. Like with Frozen she said that cause Anna and Elsa are beautiful: 'As adventurous and independent as these gals are, the message is still that you must be beautiful while you do it.' which strikes me as a bit ridiculous.

I cant remember seeing a post by her about this doll but I hope I do soon. I have a feeling its going to be one of her better posts here her points are all sensible and you dont get the feeling she's spent alot of time hunting for faults.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Vertefae on March 17, 2014, 04:59:05 AM
That's the lady that likes to smack down anything that she doesn't like. I get trying to protect your child but this lady takes it to the extreme.

She's made some very good points in the past but some terrible ones too. She once said that the G4 Ponies were sexualized, not even the EG dolls but the actual ponies  :what:

She seems to find fault with alot of things that arnt faulty. Like with Frozen she said that cause Anna and Elsa are beautiful: 'As adventurous and independent as these gals are, the message is still that you must be beautiful while you do it.' which strikes me as a bit ridiculous.

I cant remember seeing a post by her about this doll but I hope I do soon. I have a feeling its going to be one of her better posts here her points are all sensible and you dont get the feeling she's spent alot of time hunting for faults.

I have to wonder if she's comfortable in her own body. She's very quick to shame people/things she considers beautiful. Almost as if they should be ashamed of how they look.

As far as why some girls aren't affected by how fashion dolls look, maybe they have a more supportive family life, maybe their patents aren't always going on about dieting, maybe body image isn't made such a huge deal and maybe they simply don't care because it's not being made such a huge deal in their everyday lives.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Wardah on March 17, 2014, 05:48:12 AM
That's the lady that likes to smack down anything that she doesn't like. I get trying to protect your child but this lady takes it to the extreme.

She's made some very good points in the past but some terrible ones too. She once said that the G4 Ponies were sexualized, not even the EG dolls but the actual ponies  :what:

She seems to find fault with alot of things that arnt faulty. Like with Frozen she said that cause Anna and Elsa are beautiful: 'As adventurous and independent as these gals are, the message is still that you must be beautiful while you do it.' which strikes me as a bit ridiculous.

I cant remember seeing a post by her about this doll but I hope I do soon. I have a feeling its going to be one of her better posts here her points are all sensible and you dont get the feeling she's spent alot of time hunting for faults.

I have to wonder if she's comfortable in her own body. She's very quick to shame people/things she considers beautiful. Almost as if they should be ashamed of how they look.

This is exactly what bugs me about her. To her it almost seems like beauty is a flaw. Not everyone can get good grades or be a sports star even if they try their hardest. For some people being beautiful is all they have that stands out because they are average at everything else. Whether they are good people or not should be what gets judged. Not achievements or looks. Some people could have tons of achievements and just be so full of themselves that nobody can stand them. And a model could just be one of the kindest people ever using their off time to help others.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Hervoyel on March 17, 2014, 06:46:45 AM
As far as why some girls aren't affected by how fashion dolls look, maybe they have a more supportive family life, maybe their patents aren't always going on about dieting, maybe body image isn't made such a huge deal and maybe they simply don't care because it's not being made such a huge deal in their everyday lives.

I wonder if some of it isn't just a matter of personality - some kids are pretty oblivious to the surrounding culture in general, and on the flip side, some soak everything up even when their family is fairly supportive (or limits pop-culture consumption).   And preferences fit in there too; I didn't play with fashion dolls as a kid - they just didn't interest me at all - but my sister loved them, and there wasn't any parental pressure on either of us to be for or against them, y'know?

I don't doubt that family plays a big roll in reinforcing (or counteracting) general cultural norms and trends, but I think there are probably too many other factors at play.  After all, I'd think we've all met exceptions to any generalization like that - people who had supportive/socially-aware parents who ended up with eating disorders as well as ex-child models with healthy self-images?
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: little.fox on March 17, 2014, 07:53:10 AM
Yes, I agree that partly it's probably just down to personality!

Just like you say some kids will soak everything up, dispite what parents say & do.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: brightberry on March 17, 2014, 09:27:12 AM
I agree many children will do that.  But I also know that can be tempered with good parenting and keeping their child aware that there is another point of view will at least give them something to turn to when things get out of hand. 

I still think it's interesting that in the study there is a dramatic dip in barbie's influence in the 2nd grade and a rise in the Emme.

http://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2006/04/19/post-1/

I don't think that can all be accounted for by personality alone.  Maybe they lost interest in barbie.  Maybe they think she's for babies or maybe they heard all the noise that was going around at that time about how unrealistic barbie was.  And maybe, now faced with this new doll, they felt uncertain again.


I agree that the http://pigtailpalsblog.com/ writer is often all over the place.


But even if she doesn't like barbie, she still lets her kids have them and she was still invited to meet the Monster High creators and give her input.  In the end, I think she just wants her kids to look more critically at what's being marketed to them.

http://pigtailpalsblog.com/2012/08/the-tooth-fairy-is-friends-with-mermaid-barbies/#.UycnX840h8E

http://pigtailpalsblog.com/2013/04/barbie-in-a-bucket/

http://pigtailpalsblog.com/2013/07/barbie-world-is-it-what-i-thought-it-would-be/#.UycX4c40h8E

http://pigtailpalsblog.com/2012/10/meeting-with-mattel-about-monster-high/#.Uycd2840h8E



Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: Hervoyel on March 17, 2014, 10:00:42 AM
I don't think that can all be accounted for by personality alone.

That's the issue with both extremes of this - nothing exists in a vacuum, so it's never going to be all personality or all parenting or all pop culture.

That Barbie vs. Emme storybook study allows for some of that by differentiating by age, but there must be so many other factors at play in the background (and to be fair, maybe the study itself talked about that and the blog just didn't mention it).  Another thing I wonder about is the cumulative effects - so the immediate effects may change with maturity, but what effect do the impressions of the younger ones have in the longer term? 

What does it mean to have had that influence at 3 (and thought those thoughts at that specific time) when you're 5 or 10, or 35.  It seems like the fact that they don't think the same way at 10 would be a separate issue from the fact that they're (potentially) now a 10-year-old who had certain thoughts at 3.
Title: Re: The 'average proportions' doll
Post by: tinyblondie on March 17, 2014, 11:45:45 AM
As far as why some girls aren't affected by how fashion dolls look, maybe they have a more supportive family life, maybe their patents aren't always going on about dieting, maybe body image isn't made such a huge deal and maybe they simply don't care because it's not being made such a huge deal in their everyday lives.

I wonder if some of it isn't just a matter of personality - some kids are pretty oblivious to the surrounding culture in general, and on the flip side, some soak everything up even when their family is fairly supportive (or limits pop-culture consumption).   And preferences fit in there too; I didn't play with fashion dolls as a kid - they just didn't interest me at all - but my sister loved them, and there wasn't any parental pressure on either of us to be for or against them, y'know?

I don't doubt that family plays a big roll in reinforcing (or counteracting) general cultural norms and trends, but I think there are probably too many other factors at play.  After all, I'd think we've all met exceptions to any generalization like that - people who had supportive/socially-aware parents who ended up with eating disorders as well as ex-child models with healthy self-images?

Hoenstly I think its impossible to pinpoint or point fingers in regards to body image problems. I grew up in a house where my mum never dieted or talked about diets, where my sister made it clear that she only went to weight watchers to help her maintain a healthy weight and where I played with Ponies and Tea Sets rather than Barbies. But I still had Anorexia for 7 years. They say prevention is better than the cure but ED's are such deep rooted problems that I think working out ways to reinforce healthy body image is much better.
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal