We've done a huge purge on accounts that haven't been touched in over 5 years! If you're a returning member and can't login please email mlpchief @ gmail.com for more details!
Site Announcements Arena Tutorials Sigs & Site Support Introductions Pony Corral Swap Talk! Pony Fairs! MLP Nirvana Nirvana Sales Pony Brag Arena Off Topic Dollhouse Toy Box & Games Cupboard Customs Custom Sales Arts & Crafts Corral Adoptables For Sale - For Auction For Trade Wanted Trader & Classifieds Support What's Your Problem Private Messages Contact Us!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Martini on May 31, 2013, 02:11:20 AMQuote from: ShortyBoo on May 31, 2013, 01:40:19 AMDid Dexter Charming remind anyone else of Jackson? Yes, that was my immediate reaction. Maybe it's just the same voice actor?Dexter has a bit more of a manlier voice than Jackson's. Cindy Robinson does Jackson, but Evan Smith does Daring and Dexter. He's the voice of Gil and Deuce.
Quote from: ShortyBoo on May 31, 2013, 01:40:19 AMDid Dexter Charming remind anyone else of Jackson? Yes, that was my immediate reaction. Maybe it's just the same voice actor?
Did Dexter Charming remind anyone else of Jackson?
Quote from: Bow Tie on May 31, 2013, 08:21:14 AMQuote from: Martini on May 31, 2013, 02:11:20 AMQuote from: ShortyBoo on May 31, 2013, 01:40:19 AMDid Dexter Charming remind anyone else of Jackson? Yes, that was my immediate reaction. Maybe it's just the same voice actor?Dexter has a bit more of a manlier voice than Jackson's. Cindy Robinson does Jackson, but Evan Smith does Daring and Dexter. He's the voice of Gil and Deuce.I didn't really mean his voice. It was more the way he acted that reminded me of Jackson.
Quote from: Rhini on May 31, 2013, 07:28:22 AMGonna echo what other people have said thus far,webisodes=lovedolls=ehhh....I think Raven looks alright, but I really hope these are prototypes. Cause right now she's just not doing it for me at all. I feel like they used really cheap fabric too, they just don't look like MH quality.I couldn't agree more! The webisodes were cool but the dolls are meh. I too hope they are just prototypes. They remind me of dollar store knock off princess dolls. I am happy however, that they are the same size of MH dolls so we can use their outfits. Will I buy them? Yes.I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees a touch I pinkie pie in Madeline hatter(I know pinkie has been referred to as a mad hatter in mlpfim)
Gonna echo what other people have said thus far,webisodes=lovedolls=ehhh....I think Raven looks alright, but I really hope these are prototypes. Cause right now she's just not doing it for me at all. I feel like they used really cheap fabric too, they just don't look like MH quality.
The story is that Cupid is transferring from MH to Ever After High. Its where the children of fairytales go to school. There is also a website. I think its linked in the first post. Here it is. http://www.everafterhigh.com/en-us/
I'm a bit weirded out by all the people here saying that they expected more from the dolls.To me they look just like the webisode models. Is there something wrong with my eyes? I expected them to be all same-face because that's how they are shown in the cartoon. What I didn't expect, though, were painted on eyes. I legit hoped they would have inset eyes or at least eye lashes ^^#Well, maybe they will be cheaper than MH. Like, MH budget doll price. I'd be very okay with that!Also we should probably keep in mind that those photos are really blurry and shot from an inconvinient angle. Maybe the dolls will look better once we can see better pics of them PS: Oh boy, no matter where I look, people are comparing this product to Disney.Newsflash, Disney didn't invent the tales those characters are based on! The characters don't even look like the Disney counterparts (except for Ashlynn having dark blonde hair) PPS: Is it just me or are we supposed to root for the rebels? I don't see anyone identifying with Apple so far. Hehe!
Thanks, Rhini!Maybe I just have lower standards but I would be okay with the faces as we can see them right now. Again, I also hope that the angle distorts them a bit because yes, they have something of 2.0 Lala. Very poofy faces.A quick question to everyone who knows more about dolls than me: is it common that prototypes would already be shown in boxes? To give customers an overall impression of the product maybe?Because I can't really buy the prototype theory right now. They look so.. finished to me because they're already packed up ^^#
Quote from: Zapper on May 31, 2013, 09:30:45 AMThanks, Rhini!Maybe I just have lower standards but I would be okay with the faces as we can see them right now. Again, I also hope that the angle distorts them a bit because yes, they have something of 2.0 Lala. Very poofy faces.A quick question to everyone who knows more about dolls than me: is it common that prototypes would already be shown in boxes? To give customers an overall impression of the product maybe?Because I can't really buy the prototype theory right now. They look so.. finished to me because they're already packed up ^^#Yeah, very puffy. But with that angle it's so hard to tell.And yep! With a new line especially so. I actually am responsible for making prototype boxes like this all the time at work (accursed mockup boxes!!) You want to be able to show the retailer as close to a finished product as possible, because ultimately they decide the fate of line, if they'll carry it or not