If you have an old account and cannot remember how to log in, please contact us at mlpchief @ gmail.com. Additionally, if you want a different screen name, please contact us instead of making a new account! Thanks!
Site Announcements Arena Tutorials Sigs & Site Support Introductions Pony Corral Swap Talk! Pony Fairs! MLP Nirvana Nirvana Sales Pony Brag Arena Off Topic Dollhouse Toy Box & Games Cupboard Customs Custom Sales Arts & Crafts Corral Adoptables For Sale - For Auction For Trade Wanted Trader & Classifieds Support What's Your Problem Private Messages Contact Us!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This is just my personal opinion, but . . . ponies look better with shorter manes. Like the length of G1 Glory or Blossom's mane. I think I'd like even the not-so-horsey gens more, like G4, if they had more modest hair + forelocks. (Just to be really pedantic, I do not consider bangs (like G3.5 Cheerilee) to be the same as a forelock. Has to be a thin bit of hair going straight down the nose.)I had Brush 'n Grow Bouquet as a kid and her mane made her not-fun for hairplay, ironically. It got in the way. It was too thick for my clumsy little-kid hands to style. And when I tried to brush and comb her, the bristles / teeth broke off.
I have a trait I dislike the most. [Spoilered for your own risk just for safety reasons.]SpoilerMine would be IDW.Honestly I really don't know why IDW just simply ruins the characters and the story. The problematic part is that most fans consider IDW to be CANON even when it really doesn't.Spike is one of the characters that IDW actually ruined. I couldn't felt more sick of how they did Spike. I mean when I look back in G1 comics, they're pretty standard yet kept in their character traits and really came up with better stories. But what IDW just does is this: leT's do A RaNdoM ArC That EvEryoNe Go HyPe By HaViNg DiSCorD tO DeAl WiTh A cRazY Ex tHat wAs NevEr In tHe ShOw AnD MeSs WiTh tHe ChaRaCters.That's not how supposed comics work IDW. Even nowadays You're slacking off that would later on your compony would shamble from your corruption.I mean the arcs that they do weren't good to me. They're just like, what the heck were they thinking? Are they really desperate for attention with their audience?I'm sorry if this is a massive vent. Because I know that IDW was not my personal flavor taste and I wouldn't even try to bother looking at the artstyle they gave for MLP:FIM.But that's not all as when they did the MLP:Generations thing, Did they even bother to know the original G1 characters? Or even what G1 supposed to be.It could've been an actual past or the year 1980.But NO! IDW has to make it into some sort of dimension. HOW DOES THIS MAKES SENSE?! I know Equestria girls were a thing and I happen to dislike it. But is IDW really trying to lean on Equestria girls than the actual ponies? I really don't want to like have myself to look at the comics because I couldn't handle the wrongness of IDW trying to ruin the franchise like that.Especially G5 that had Discord when he never appears in the show.And they also starting to ruin Sparky as well. but I'm a bit thankful that G1 Spike didn't even came to the IDW Generations comics because I don't want my idol to be ruined by it.*phew*That was a long rant and yet my opinion of a popular trait that I actually dislike and yet others like.I just wish Archie comics would still kept their business since Archie was the comics that I actually enjoy with Sonic ones.And I just wish IDW would just look back at their stuff that they did with MLP.I'm sorry if this actually something that no one agrees but this is my opinion. And also offends any IDW fans about this.If anyone would ask me to take this post down. Or want me to remove the rant I have said. Let me know. And I apologie for this message. I just want to get this off of my chest. Any feedback is appreciated although I'm really uncomfortable talking about IDW and it's popular corrupting traits.also TheClassCalico if you read this I don't know if this is alright even though that what I said was actually a bit "toxic" rant but I honestly really felt unconfortable talking about what I dislike.
Quote from: LadyMoondancer on July 13, 2023, 07:25:02 PMThis is just my personal opinion, but . . . ponies look better with shorter manes. Like the length of G1 Glory or Blossom's mane. I think I'd like even the not-so-horsey gens more, like G4, if they had more modest hair + forelocks. (Just to be really pedantic, I do not consider bangs (like G3.5 Cheerilee) to be the same as a forelock. Has to be a thin bit of hair going straight down the nose.)I had Brush 'n Grow Bouquet as a kid and her mane made her not-fun for hairplay, ironically. It got in the way. It was too thick for my clumsy little-kid hands to style. And when I tried to brush and comb her, the bristles / teeth broke off.I agree that short manes usually look better and are certainly easier to manage.Quote from: TarkanDragon on July 13, 2023, 10:42:29 AMI have a trait I dislike the most. [Spoilered for your own risk just for safety reasons.]SpoilerMine would be IDW.Honestly I really don't know why IDW just simply ruins the characters and the story. The problematic part is that most fans consider IDW to be CANON even when it really doesn't.Spike is one of the characters that IDW actually ruined. I couldn't felt more sick of how they did Spike. I mean when I look back in G1 comics, they're pretty standard yet kept in their character traits and really came up with better stories. But what IDW just does is this: leT's do A RaNdoM ArC That EvEryoNe Go HyPe By HaViNg DiSCorD tO DeAl WiTh A cRazY Ex tHat wAs NevEr In tHe ShOw AnD MeSs WiTh tHe ChaRaCters.That's not how supposed comics work IDW. Even nowadays You're slacking off that would later on your compony would shamble from your corruption.I mean the arcs that they do weren't good to me. They're just like, what the heck were they thinking? Are they really desperate for attention with their audience?I'm sorry if this is a massive vent. Because I know that IDW was not my personal flavor taste and I wouldn't even try to bother looking at the artstyle they gave for MLP:FIM.But that's not all as when they did the MLP:Generations thing, Did they even bother to know the original G1 characters? Or even what G1 supposed to be.It could've been an actual past or the year 1980.But NO! IDW has to make it into some sort of dimension. HOW DOES THIS MAKES SENSE?! I know Equestria girls were a thing and I happen to dislike it. But is IDW really trying to lean on Equestria girls than the actual ponies? I really don't want to like have myself to look at the comics because I couldn't handle the wrongness of IDW trying to ruin the franchise like that.Especially G5 that had Discord when he never appears in the show.And they also starting to ruin Sparky as well. but I'm a bit thankful that G1 Spike didn't even came to the IDW Generations comics because I don't want my idol to be ruined by it.*phew*That was a long rant and yet my opinion of a popular trait that I actually dislike and yet others like.I just wish Archie comics would still kept their business since Archie was the comics that I actually enjoy with Sonic ones.And I just wish IDW would just look back at their stuff that they did with MLP.I'm sorry if this actually something that no one agrees but this is my opinion. And also offends any IDW fans about this.If anyone would ask me to take this post down. Or want me to remove the rant I have said. Let me know. And I apologie for this message. I just want to get this off of my chest. Any feedback is appreciated although I'm really uncomfortable talking about IDW and it's popular corrupting traits.also TheClassCalico if you read this I don't know if this is alright even though that what I said was actually a bit "toxic" rant but I honestly really felt unconfortable talking about what I dislike.No worries! For future reference, this thread was intended to be about the toylines rather than pieces of media surrounding the franchise, though. It's my bad for not clarifying that. Personally, I disagree, I thought that the comics did an amazing job but that isn't to say that I always liked them or that I thought everything was handled well.