collapse

* Navigation

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Who's Online

Author Topic: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)  (Read 30853 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Skeen

  • Not actually Captain Janeway
  • Trade Count: (+79)
  • MIB Rapunzel Pony
  • *****
  • Posts: 5628
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #240 on: October 14, 2016, 12:14:30 PM »
You know what else I like?  Cadance isn't hot pink.
I think that's the only thing I like!

Her cutie mark also looks like the correct one too, without the red gem on top.
I've never noticed a red gem on top  :blink:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

From StrawberryReef

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Fanart Wiki

Offline LadyMoondancer

  • *Arena VIP*
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • MIB Licensing Show Pinkie Pie
  • ******
  • Posts: 11464
    • View Profile
    • http://www.superpony.com
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #241 on: October 14, 2016, 12:54:11 PM »
I like the new Shining Armor mold much better, especially his face.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Pic from Strawberry Reef.

^ Previous version had so many sharp, flat planes that he looked like Kryton from Red Dwarf.  There was also something strange about his stomach.  I can't quite articulate it, but it wasn't rounded enough.
Visit my Tumblr, Heck Yeah, Pony Scans!

Offline SpaceButtPonies

  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Lil Cupcake Sister Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 963
  • Gender: Female
  • 6v9
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #242 on: October 14, 2016, 12:59:41 PM »
I like the new Shining Armor mold much better, especially his face.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Pic from Strawberry Reef.

^ Previous version had so many sharp, flat planes that he looked like Kryton from Red Dwarf.  There was also something strange about his stomach.  I can't quite articulate it, but it wasn't rounded enough.
I'm happy they didn't use troll hair for him again. I hate how they did that for the 1st Shining Armor, it looks like he's gotta go fast! XD
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Siggy made by tailrustedtealeaf

Offline LadyMoondancer

  • *Arena VIP*
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • MIB Licensing Show Pinkie Pie
  • ******
  • Posts: 11464
    • View Profile
    • http://www.superpony.com
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #243 on: October 14, 2016, 01:17:51 PM »
Was that a Sonic the Hedgehog reference?  You rock.  XD
Visit my Tumblr, Heck Yeah, Pony Scans!

Offline sd_dreamcrystal

  • Trade Count: (+50)
  • MOC Mimic
  • *****
  • Posts: 5411
  • Gender: Female
  • Reach far beyond the boundaries of imagination.
    • View Profile
    • DreamCrystalArt @ DeviantART
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #244 on: October 14, 2016, 05:12:08 PM »
They're... A little odd. Their heads look too round somehow, Cadance's symbol looks too small, and Shining Armor's eyes look weird. I hope it's just the photo making it look that way. But hey, there's a boy pony, yay for variety :D
Shining Armor was the only brushable boy that's been out for awhile for the G4 era :/ we're now just getting Soarin' who is the 2nd brushable for G4. So that's not very much variety...
I don't really count the Soarin FS because he is a reused female mold like the Shining Armor FS was a reused female mold.. I guess with FS ponies they are a little more gender neutral in the mold but still
My DeviantArt, why not drop by and take a look!

Offline SpaceButtPonies

  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Lil Cupcake Sister Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 963
  • Gender: Female
  • 6v9
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #245 on: October 14, 2016, 05:27:56 PM »
Was that a Sonic the Hedgehog reference?  You rock.  XD

Haha yes!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Siggy made by tailrustedtealeaf

Offline EnaRocketQueen

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Lil Cupcake Sister Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 904
  • Gender: Female
  • Princess of Equestria <3
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #246 on: October 15, 2016, 05:38:42 AM »
You know what else I like?  Cadance isn't hot pink.
I think that's the only thing I like!

Her cutie mark also looks like the correct one too, without the red gem on top.
I've never noticed a red gem on top  :blink:

If I remember rightly, her cutie mark changed between two designs throughout A Canterlot Wedding. Without checking the wiki, I think the change might have been the red gem sometimes being there and sometimes not. I know after that episode it stayed consistent with one design that didn't have the red gem

Offline Deep Purple Crystal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Dazzle Surprise
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
  • "Jewels! Jewels in your eyes!"
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #247 on: October 15, 2016, 06:52:04 AM »
Nope. I still cannot force myself to find these new molds attractive. While I do like that Hasbro is trying to reinvent the brushable line in a more 'show-accurate' fashion, I think that the issue is that FiM's character designs simply do not aesthetically work when translated into physical toys - they are overly angular and stylized, which may work in for a show to allow for more economic animation and design, but not necessarily for figures, especially these bizarre creatures with stumpy legs, pointed muzzles and weird necks. They just look ugly - I guess it all factors down to personal taste, but I still long for the cute and streamlined yet realistic designs of G1 and G3 (G2 was a departure in terms of designs, but at least the molds have a sense of elegance. The revamped brushables merely look goofy).

I'm sticking with the theories from the G5 Assumptions thread. Damn it, where's my 100,000-piece ponies and my Princess Sweetie Apple Sparkle Cutie Dazzle? The Royal Family Set doesn't even come with a vial for those collector tears!
« Last Edit: October 15, 2016, 06:55:28 AM by Deep Purple Crystal »

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Thanks to LordBlumiere and Corona for the amazing Masquerade and Baby Sugarcake in my sig!

Offline Leave a Whisper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Colombian Baby Pony
  • ******
  • Posts: 19799
  • Gender: Female
  • In the Land of Dreams
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #248 on: October 15, 2016, 07:24:59 AM »
Nope. I still cannot force myself to find these new molds attractive. While I do like that Hasbro is trying to reinvent the brushable line in a more 'show-accurate' fashion, I think that the issue is that FiM's character designs simply do not aesthetically work when translated into physical toys - they are overly angular and stylized, which may work in for a show to allow for more economic animation and design, but not necessarily for figures, especially these bizarre creatures with stumpy legs, pointed muzzles and weird necks. They just look ugly - I guess it all factors down to personal taste, but I still long for the cute and streamlined yet realistic designs of G1 and G3 (G2 was a departure in terms of designs, but at least the molds have a sense of elegance. The revamped brushables merely look goofy).

I'm sticking with the theories from the G5 Assumptions thread. Damn it, where's my 100,000-piece ponies and my Princess Sweetie Apple Sparkle Cutie Dazzle? The Royal Family Set doesn't even come with a vial for those collector tears!


The Tear Vial is sold separately. ;)
Thanks to TheRockinStallion for my Ponysona Artless

Offline Sparkle Pony

  • F.O.E. Pony
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sweet Scoops Pony w/Charm
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
  • Gender: Female
  • I'm not scrawny, I'm svelte!
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #249 on: October 15, 2016, 10:15:09 AM »
Nope. I still cannot force myself to find these new molds attractive. While I do like that Hasbro is trying to reinvent the brushable line in a more 'show-accurate' fashion, I think that the issue is that FiM's character designs simply do not aesthetically work when translated into physical toys - they are overly angular and stylized, which may work in for a show to allow for more economic animation and design, but not necessarily for figures, especially these bizarre creatures with stumpy legs, pointed muzzles and weird necks. They just look ugly - I guess it all factors down to personal taste, but I still long for the cute and streamlined yet realistic designs of G1 and G3 (G2 was a departure in terms of designs, but at least the molds have a sense of elegance. The revamped brushables merely look goofy).

I'm sticking with the theories from the G5 Assumptions thread. Damn it, where's my 100,000-piece ponies and my Princess Sweetie Apple Sparkle Cutie Dazzle? The Royal Family Set doesn't even come with a vial for those collector tears!


The Tear Vial is sold separately. ;)
My favorite thread strikes back!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline True

  • Eartha Uncorn
  • Trade Count: (+98)
  • MOC Mimic
  • *****
  • Posts: 4662
  • Unicorn of the earth
    • View Profile
    • Truly Customs
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #250 on: October 16, 2016, 10:33:56 AM »
They honestly kinda remind me how I (and a lot of other people) tend to draw G4 style ponies xD

:heart: My Sales Thread :heart:
Toola Roola Avatar by Pikashoes!

Offline Foxtale

  • Trade Count: (+20)
  • Reverse Gusty Pony
  • *****
  • Posts: 8088
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #251 on: October 16, 2016, 10:38:11 AM »
Will be hard to formulate an opinion about the ponies until I see them in person. The angle on this Cadance looks like she is suffering from the strange side look when they are straight on. It's so hard to make them look true to character and not strange IRL. I will most definitely be getting this set when it comes out. Excited to see new pony toys, but my wallet isn't... it got used to not buying ponies.
~Foxtale~

Offline TornadoTwist

  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Dabbles Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 1404
  • Gender: Female
  • Author of MLP Merch
    • View Profile

Offline Taxel

  • Cutie Pops Crusader
  • Trade Count: (+44)
  • Rapunzel Pony
  • *****
  • Posts: 3720
  • Gender: Female
  • Sundance <3
    • View Profile
    • Collections
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #253 on: October 17, 2016, 12:40:11 AM »
Doctor Fluttershy is too cute for words!!!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline zombienixon

  • Slaughterhouse II
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Lil Sweetcake Sister Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 1088
  • Gender: Male
  • Pink Pony Addict
    • View Profile
Re: Rebranding Brushables Spotted? (Royal Family in Packaging! Page 14)
« Reply #254 on: October 17, 2016, 03:41:16 AM »
I guess it wasn't just a bad photo angle, Cadance's head is kinda messed up.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal