The MLP Arena

Pony Talk => Pony Corral => Topic started by: DappledHazel on November 19, 2015, 12:44:02 PM

Title: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: DappledHazel on November 19, 2015, 12:44:02 PM
I noticed the newborn and baby ponies already have cutie marks, are they born with it?

If so, I think that makes more sense then in G4, if they don't have a cuite mark and you gotta give em' a name.. How do you know what to name him/her? Usually their cuitemarks have to do with their name. (AppleJack's cuite mark has apples, Rainbow Dash has a rainbow, ect.) So what if you got a pony that you call Muddy and they end up being really clean so their cuite mark is the opposite, do you just change their name? (I love G4 eitherway, the whole cuite mark thing doesn't seem right.)




Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: NigheanRuadh on November 19, 2015, 12:46:26 PM
Yes, the G1 babies have always had symbols.  (They weren't called cutie marks back then.)  Except for some versions of Ember.  I'm not sure why she didn't.  As you pointed out, even the newborns and teeny tinies have symbols.  :)
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: DappledHazel on November 19, 2015, 12:53:26 PM
Yes, the G1 babies have always had symbols.  (They weren't called cutie marks back then.)  Except for some versions of Ember.  I'm not sure why she didn't.  As you pointed out, even the newborns and teeny tinies have symbols.  :)

Okay  ^.^
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 19, 2015, 12:55:50 PM
Yes, they're born with symbols.  All except poor Ember.

(Sidenote, Lauren Faust had Ember as a kid--the purple with pink hair one--and that where the inspiration for the whole "getting your cutie mark" idea came from.  She mentioned it on her Twitter once.)

My personal headcanon is that baby ponies are born looking similar to their parents, but when they reach puberty they develop their own colors and their own unique symbol, and also choose a new name.  I think it would be a bummer if Baby Surprise had to answer to "Baby Surprise" her entire life and constantly get mixed up with her mom, ha ha!
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Haruna on November 19, 2015, 01:05:27 PM
One could argue either way. :) I think that the people who made G1 may not have deeply considered whether a pony is born with a symbol/cutie mark, but since their newborns and teeny tiny ponies had symbols, I guess they decided they were born with symbols. Interesting that you mention Ember, NigheanRuadh; I wonder if at the beginning of the G1 line, the creators thought that baby ponies might not be born with symbols because they hadn't discovered their magic yet or something; I'm remembering Ember's lines in "Rescue From Midnight Castle" where she's asking Twilight what she'll be able to do someday (fly like Firefly, or disappear like Twilight, something like that), and Twilight says, "You'll grow up to be your own special little pony." (And then dragons appear and kidnap her. :P) Anyway, I think eventually, as the line went on, the G1 creators decided that every pony, even the very youngest, got a symbol.

When my sister and I played with our ponies, we thought it was too embarrassing and made no sense that a pony should be born with a babyish symbol -- say, a bottle or a baby rattle -- and then have to grow up and keep that humiliating symbol, so we would pretend that as they grew into slightly older baby ponies they got a more mature symbol which they then kept all their lives.

Edit: Oh, I remember reading that about Lauren Faust, Lady Moondancer. Very interesting. And I've also wondered about the babies who are named after their mothers. I love those babies, but it would get annoying to always have to distinguish yourself from your mother. :lol: I have some experience with this in real life, as my brother has my dad's exact name (the name's been passed down for a long time). People always have to distinguish between my dad and brother. It's not too bad, but it can be a hassle and sometimes pretty funny.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Leave a Whisper on November 19, 2015, 02:00:19 PM
Yes. They're born with their symbols. In any toy Animal line, especially toy horses, it is very common for the youngsters to look like their parents.

There are individual baby ponies, that don't have official adult counterparts. Like the Sparkle babies, Baby Cuddles, Baby Ember, the Baby Brothers, etc.

In terms of production this makes sense. You can create cute family units and moms and babies by creating then to be identical, lazy from a creative standpoint, but efficient.

Most of my babies are individuals and have/will have parents chosen for them based on color combo, symbol or whatever clicks.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: BlushingBlue on November 19, 2015, 02:44:16 PM
When my sister and I played with our ponies, we thought it was too embarrassing and made no sense that a pony should be born with a babyish symbol -- say, a bottle or a baby rattle -- and then have to grow up and keep that humiliating symbol

This bit of Fridge Logic always bugged me as well. It's all well and good for a baby pony to have a babyish symbol like a rattle, bib, mobile, dolly -- definitely not a horse head on a stick though, seriously what the heck!? -- but these babies are presumably going to be adults one day, and then what? Unless they're never going to grow up at all, which makes the whole situation terrifying instead of merely cruel.

Baby Glory, et al, didn't bother me quite as much since they're of magical origin. So they're more like... time-frozen clones of the originals? Now that I really think about it, it's not actually less weird... :blink:
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 19, 2015, 02:52:36 PM
Maybe all the babies with "baby-ish" symbols go on to work in daycares.  :P

The "make a baby look just like mom" was a pretty brilliant marketing tactic.  I remember flipping OUT when Moondancer, my favorite pony, had a baby pony released.  My mom ended up getting her for me as a "prize" for finishing swimming lessons.

At the time I didn't question at all why she looked like a tiny clone of mom.  Kid logic!
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: MJNSEIFER on November 19, 2015, 02:56:43 PM
I hope no one minds me saying this, but I personally think that this is one of the things that G4 did better (and I'm sure I could find at least one thing that each generation, or even each show did better than the other, so don't think this is some anti pre-FIM thing).  Maybe this is because I started to be a true fan with FIM, and I latched on to the whole idea of a cutie mark representing the talent of the pony, and that logic can (in my opinion) be applied to the earlier generations if you want it to (some you have to use your imagination with, but the same applies to G4, if what Cheerilee said was any indication).

Because of this, I kind of feel that being born with a symbol that represents your talent, or at least what you're going to enjoy doing just doesn't flow very well for me.  I'm sure this sounds strange to people who grew up with G1, or anything before G4, but I really love the earn your cutie mark storyline, at least back when the show seemed to have a clear view of what it was (which, in my opinion, wouldn't have been hard to maintain).  You're probably thinking that the whole thing about cutie marks representing a ponies talent is exclusive to G4, and in a sense it is, but in another sense, it's the only generation that confirmed it was.

In previous generations, there are various cutie marks, or symbols if you prefer, that could easily be viewed as representing the pony's talent; pony's who were written as being musical in someway were often given musical symbols as cutie marks, while ponies who were good at sports were given appropriate symbols to match.  Sometimes, it seemed to be something else, like maybe what the pony enjoyed the most, rather than what they were good at, but ultimately, the idea of a cutie mark representing the "special talent" of a pony, doesn't have to be just a G4 thing, and it isn't too far out for it to be incorporated into headcanons of the earlier generations.

The idea of symbols or cutie marks matching the name of the pony is kind of exaggerated (so I'm glad you said "usually", DappledHazel),  but I do sort of see your point, and there are some ponies in all generations, who's names not only match their cutie marks, but make it a coincidence that it did so, even before they earned it (even though, this is only canon in FIM).  However, there are some ponies where, even in a world where cutie marks are earned, that an alternative idea of how that pony got their name can be found, even if it matches their cutie mark - take the ponies you mentioned for example; Rainbow Dash would have been born with rainbow colors, and since it's possible that G4 pegasus ponies are at least temporarily born with flight, she could have "dashed" all over the place as a foal, and received her name that way.  Furthermore, naming your foal after something apple-related appears to be an Apple Family tradition, so Applejack would have most likely have gotten an "apple" name either way.

Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Ponyfan on November 19, 2015, 02:59:28 PM
I think Ember was the very first baby pony? I also agree with Haruna that they seemd to be going for the "your symbol appears when you discover your special talent" but by the time Hasbro produced the other Baby Ponies they decided they were born with a symbol. I wish Hasbro would have remembered Ember and showed what her symbol was and her talent.


Ponyfan
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Al-1701 on November 19, 2015, 03:00:57 PM
I think it would be a bummer if Baby Surprise had to answer to "Baby Surprise" her entire life and constantly get mixed up with her mom, ha ha!
I actually changed "Baby" to "Little" in my works.  When I included colts in this system, they have "Junior" after their name.

I have a similar headcannon that G1 ponies are born resembling their parents and grow in their adult coats, manes, and symbols through puberty and take on a new name.  It seems to be a really popular explanation.  Perhaps a little more symbolic too.  You start out as a reflection of your parents, but as you gain knowledge for yourself, you build your own identity.  And symbols are more a representation of your tastes, abilities, and values rather than your "special talent".

Like, I've taken Wind Whistler's symbol of whistles to represent her value for fairness.  Being logical but also moral, she sees being fair as a virtue.  It isn't her special talent (readily absorbing, understanding, and using information as well as pattern recognition are), and her favorite hobby is singing.  However, the value of fairness is what defines her.  Thus, whistles symbolize her, the tools of referees, police, and other upholders of fairness.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: MJNSEIFER on November 19, 2015, 03:54:24 PM
I think Ember was the very first baby pony? I also agree with Haruna that they seemd to be going for the "your symbol appears when you discover your special talent" but by the time Hasbro produced the other Baby Ponies they decided they were born with a symbol. I wish Hasbro would have remembered Ember and showed what her symbol was and her talent.


Ponyfan
There's a version of Ember with a star as her symbol.  She doesn't appear to have a backcard story, so there's no real clue as to what it could mean, if you want symbols/cutie marks to have meaning.  I don't think the storytape mentions anything about it, but it's been a while since I heard it (on YouTube).

http://www.mylittlewiki.org/wiki/Ember%27s_Dream (http://www.mylittlewiki.org/wiki/Ember%27s_Dream)
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Blue Haired Ken Doll on November 19, 2015, 03:57:10 PM
Never thought of it that way, cool observation
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: PuddingPie on November 19, 2015, 04:20:45 PM
as for Ponies like Baby Surprise and Baby Lickety Split, i always assumed that as they got older they were allowed to pick their own names based on their talents and experiences. maybe their cutie marks change and deviate a little bit, but not majorly.

i like to think of it from a Harvest Moon perspective: each new gen of Ponies are descendants of the old ones, even if they have similar names :O
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Al-1701 on November 19, 2015, 04:22:57 PM
There's a version of Ember with a star as her symbol.  She doesn't appear to have a backcard story, so there's no real clue as to what it could mean, if you want symbols/cutie marks to have meaning.  I don't think the storytape mentions anything about it, but it's been a while since I heard it (on YouTube).
Oh yeah, the one where the villain is a wig maker who wants to steal the Rainbow ponies' manes and tails to make wigs for rich people in...New York City.

Pace Cowboys:  "New York City?"

Yeah, nothing about Ember's symbol, though symbols were not given much in universe attention.  It was a visual representation of you.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: NoPonySpecial on November 19, 2015, 04:23:29 PM
I actually like G4's method better, too, MJNSeifer. (You have to stop being so worried about expressing your opinions! ;) )

You guys, can I talk about my headcanon for a bit? It's long, I was going to write a quite response to explain my theory, but it kind of turned into an essay. I guess I put more thought into this than I had realized!

My headcanon for G4 is that a pony has the option to change their name after getting a cutie mark, to make sure they are permanently associated with their talent/speciality/destiny in the minds of other ponies. It could be a semi-common coming of age tradition.

My giant essay:

Spoiler
I figure that changing one's name to match one's symbol would mostly be done by ponies that run a business. A name that exactly matches a cutie mark would be more convenient, and more memorable for other ponies. It would be better advertising for a pony to associate, say, cupcakes, with a pony named "Cupcake" rather than a pony named Dazzle Twinkle or something.

This ties in with my other headcanon that ponies have a written language that often prefers pictorial communication for simple ideas. For instance, a bakery's sign might just have a picture of a cupcake instead of the word"Bakery." If ponies referred to it as the "Cupcake" Bakery, it might then be beneficial for the head baker to be named "Cupcake" as well. The hypothetical shop would then be soon known as "Cupcake'S Bakery." If Cupcake had to take out a loan specifically for business purposes, she could sign the forms with a special stamp that matches her symbol, effectively tying both her and her business together in the eyes of the bank.

Ponies don't strictly have to having matching symbol and name for business, however. For some ponies, it could be a pride thing. They could be so happy with their talent or destiny that they wish to be forever known by it. This is simple enough. I find it more interesting to apply this to Diamond Tiara.

Diamond Tiara has been characterized as having excessive pride in her cutie mark. She constantly mocks the CMC for not having theirs. But let's not forget: she herself was fairly late in getting her cutie mark, too. She had only just gotten it before the events of Call of the Cutie, then immediately mocks Applebloom and Twist not having them. After Twist got hers, she more or less ceased to become DT's target (or maybe we just didn't see it because Twist is not a main character, but for this argument I'm assuming the CMC were her main targets.) She was really caught up on the whole "Blank Flank" thing.

One could argue that she was just being a bully and it really didn't have anything to do with pride in her cutie mark. In earlier seasons I would have said the same thing, but we know more about her now. Having a cutie mark meant she was that much closer to being a pony who could please her parents, and get the destiny she desired. Of course, it turned out she was harboring deep insecurities because she did not really know what her cutie mark meant. If she resorted to bullying to tamp down those feelings, then it isn't a jump to assume that she would change her name as well. Calling her by her name and her cutie mark at the same time reminds other that she does indeed have a destiny, and a glamorous one at that. It would be the perfect way to assert herself to others and boost her confidence.

All that said, I do still theorize that there is some small bit of magic that influences the name the parents chose, especially for ponies with important destinies. It's an exceptionally subtle magic, though. It is magic that might cause a parent to name their child "Fluttershy," but not "Butterflies." When a symbol matches a name exactly, this is when I apply the theory of name changing.

On Fluttershy:
She got her cutie mark for being good with animals, not something strictly butterfly-related. If she had been named, say, "Booboo Bear" (just work with me here!) she may have gotten a bear-related cutie mark. The butterflies really better fit her personality overall. It's not a stretch to imagine her parents choosing a name that rhymes with "butterfly" because she was a gentle and delicate foal. Then her cutie mark became butterflies over some other animal, and butterflies were the very animal that saved her that day. I think this is the "magic" at play.

Scootaloo is another example. I suppose an infant Scootaloo might have found herself on a scooter at some point; crazier things have happened! But it does seem a little unlikely, as infant-rearing in G4 is shown to be very similar to our real life. So why name her Scootaloo? We know for a fact she did not change her name after getting her cutie mark, as she was named that from the beginning. Plus, we have no evidence for her being named that except for her being good at scootering. (Is that a word?) Or perhaps she scooted around a lot as a baby. Her symbol didn't end up being a scooter, but her love for the toy and having "scoot" in her name sure fit a little too perfectly, which may also support my magic theory.

A bit about Twist, but the evidence is NOT canon, so I put it in spoilers:

Spoiler
Twist may not be a pony with an "important" destiny as far as the show is concerned, but the magic still touched her a bit. Non-canonically, her name was ret-conned by Amy Keating Rodgers to be dance related. Her mom was conceived to be named "Shimmy Shake," also a dance. (I have a source, but it was in an interview for Equestria Daily, and we cannot link to that site.) If we go by that, and assume that Twist was named for a dance, but her candy-related cutie mark also showed a candy that is made with a Twisting motion. The dance and the candy are unrelated, but brought together through a very convenient name!

Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Ninox on November 19, 2015, 04:48:14 PM
Something which I don't see brought up very often is that Ember isn't the only G1 pony without a symbol -- the Merry-Go-Round, Ballerina and Secret Surprise ponies (most of which are adults) don't have any either (unless you consider their "wardrobe" to be their symbol).

(I actually also had the same idea that baby ponies' symbols and names would change as they got older, a bit like how people in some cultures have different names as babies, children, adults and seniors that reflect who they are.)
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: sd_dreamcrystal on November 19, 2015, 05:04:36 PM
I'll be honest, as a kid I never ever linked the symbols to talents or really special abilities (except for Gusty and Fizzy since those two I vividly recall one of the G1 episodes/movies that had Gusty call wind and Fizzy creating magical bubbles during a song to trick one of the witches XD).

I think this thinking was due to ponies having names more related to their symbols, think about it. Dancing Butterflies I always felt got her name due to her butterfly symbol (though recently I did read her card information on My Little Wiki but still I will more or less link G1 symbols with G1 names)
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: NigheanRuadh on November 19, 2015, 05:21:37 PM
Pace Cowboys:  "New York City?"

"That really chaps my hide."

Couldn't resist.   :silly:
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: zombienixon on November 19, 2015, 06:01:36 PM
Maybe all the babies with "baby-ish" symbols go on to work in daycares.  :P

The "make a baby look just like mom" was a pretty brilliant marketing tactic.  I remember flipping OUT when Moondancer, my favorite pony, had a baby pony released.  My mom ended up getting her for me as a "prize" for finishing swimming lessons.

At the time I didn't question at all why she looked like a tiny clone of mom.  Kid logic!

I never thought of the Baby ponies as the adult versions' children, but as young versions of the adults. I forgot they were supposed to be their actual children.

I wish they'd do this with G4, and make filly versions of the Mane 6 and Princesses.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Leave a Whisper on November 19, 2015, 06:03:33 PM
I'll be honest, as a kid I never ever linked the symbols to talents or really special abilities (except for Gusty and Fizzy since those two I vividly recall one of the G1 episodes/movies that had Gusty call wind and Fizzy creating magical bubbles during a song to trick one of the witches XD).

I think this thinking was due to ponies having names more related to their symbols, think about it. Dancing Butterflies I always felt got her name due to her butterfly symbol (though recently I did read her card information on My Little Wiki but still I will more or less link G1 symbols with G1 names)

Same here. The symbols were originally meant to help identify ponies.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Al-1701 on November 19, 2015, 06:03:42 PM
At the time I didn't question at all why she looked like a tiny clone of mom.  Kid logic!
Then the Brits told us they come from a magic mirror.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: ValeofSpring on November 19, 2015, 06:50:47 PM
When my sister and I played with our ponies, we thought it was too embarrassing and made no sense that a pony should be born with a babyish symbol -- say, a bottle or a baby rattle -- and then have to grow up and keep that humiliating symbol, so we would pretend that as they grew into slightly older baby ponies they got a more mature symbol which they then kept all their lives.

In all my years of thinking so many many thoughts about MLP I can say I never thought about what adult Cuddles or Tiddley-Winks would look like or how sad it would be to be an adult pony w/ a rattle or bib symbol.

Not to venture off topic but I have often thought it was strange that while Hasbro made most of the first baby ponies mini-versions of adult ponies, they didn't do that with sea ponies. Surf Rider certainly looks like Sealight, but she's not Baby Sealight. Hmmmmm . . .
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: StillandSilent on November 19, 2015, 07:00:44 PM
Our opinion was that the babies would get more mature symbols as adults.  Milkweed and Tumbleweed would grow from little rocking horses to rearing stallions and bucking broncos.  Jabber and Jebber would go from tops to tornados and whirlpools.  The colors would deepen and get less babyish too.

Also, newborn twins were always one male, one female.  It would have been just impossible to have them be the same gender. 

We also played that Baby Moondancer was Moondancer as a child, not Moondancer's filly.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Ponyfan on November 19, 2015, 07:12:24 PM
I think Ember was the very first baby pony? I also agree with Haruna that they seemd to be going for the "your symbol appears when you discover your special talent" but by the time Hasbro produced the other Baby Ponies they decided they were born with a symbol. I wish Hasbro would have remembered Ember and showed what her symbol was and her talent.


Ponyfan
There's a version of Ember with a star as her symbol.  She doesn't appear to have a backcard story, so there's no real clue as to what it could mean, if you want symbols/cutie marks to have meaning.  I don't think the storytape mentions anything about it, but it's been a while since I heard it (on YouTube).

http://www.mylittlewiki.org/wiki/Ember%27s_Dream (http://www.mylittlewiki.org/wiki/Ember%27s_Dream)


But is Ember's Dream Ember supposed to be the same same Ember as thesymbol-less one that was released in 3 colors?  didn't really think  that much during my childhood how  the symbols were related to the ponies. I was basing my post off of Twilight and Ember's conversation in Rescue from Midnight Castle.

Ponyfan
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 19, 2015, 08:44:13 PM
Ember is a weird case in that she was released in three different colors (blue, pink with purple hair, and purple with pink hair) and then AGAIN in all purple.  Assuming that star-Ember is the same pony as the other three.

They also put a big picture of Baby Blossom on her card (for the star version), maybe because Baby Blossom, too, is purple.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Lore-Lei on November 20, 2015, 12:17:39 AM
My headcanon is that you're overthinking it, silly. :P
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Taffeta on November 20, 2015, 02:02:57 AM
I noticed the newborn and baby ponies already have cutie marks, are they born with it?



Sorry, but I have to say it. G1 ponies don't have cutie marks, they have symbols, or, in hasbro's official terms, rump markings. Cutie mark belongs to G3 and G4. Not to G1.

Onto the main subject, some lines of thought here.

#1 It depends on how ponies are considered to be born. Take for example the My Little Pony UK comic. In issue 1 is the infamous story of baby ponies coming from the Magic Mirror. Later in the sequence, the original Newborn Twins first come about with a mix of Baby Lucky and co's drawings and baby Lucky's Happy Go lucky Friday 13th magic bringing them to life. So ponies do not have to be "born" in Ponyland, and it makes sense that, if they are created from magic, they might have particular features at that point of creation.

#2 BORN ponies. The only ponies we can say for sure are "born" are the twins that come with Surprise Twins Pony (my sister calls them Itsy and Bitsy). They are officially 'born' and they do not have symbols. That would make the case that actually born ponies (as opposed to magically created ones) are not born with symbols.

#3 In response to names and types of symbols, this makes me think of mediaeval Japanese culture and the trend of changing names as individuals reached certain points in their life. For example, there's a famous warrior, Yoshitsune, and that is how everyone knows him, but he was called Ushiwakamaru as a small child, then Shanaou I believe as an adolescent, then he had his coming of age ceremony in which he was given the name Yoshitsune, and then, at the end of his life, I believe he had changed his name again because the Regent's name was Yoshitsune and it was a mark of deference to do that. So people's identities were fluid. I see Baby Ponies in a similar vein. Who's to say that symbol and name stay the same throughout a pony's lifespan?

#4 Alternatively, baby ponies are actually past versions of the adult ponies in some kind of weird ponyland timewarp. Maybe that explains coming through the magic mirror; they're actually coming through a time gate from the past into the present, where they already exist as adults.

As for why 3/4 Embers have no symbol, I think that is just one of those genetic variations. Rainbow Magic (RC Ringlet) also has no symbol. She has stars beneath her wing and her wings are rainbow coloured, but nothing that Hasbro could rightly term a "rump marking". Pocket Friends ponies also have symbols on one side, but not on both. There are variations in this style across the G1 line, which would be in keeping with the variations that occur in the real world with different types of person and their particular features.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Harabel on November 20, 2015, 02:25:38 AM
I'll be honest, as a kid I never ever linked the symbols to talents or really special abilities (except for Gusty and Fizzy since those two I vividly recall one of the G1 episodes/movies that had Gusty call wind and Fizzy creating magical bubbles during a song to trick one of the witches XD).

I think this thinking was due to ponies having names more related to their symbols, think about it. Dancing Butterflies I always felt got her name due to her butterfly symbol (though recently I did read her card information on My Little Wiki but still I will more or less link G1 symbols with G1 names)

Same here and as a child there were some ponies that I couldn't connect the symbol with the name because I didn't understand what they were, in the tv episodes  >_< !

I noticed the newborn and baby ponies already have cutie marks, are they born with it?



Sorry, but I have to say it. G1 ponies don't have cutie marks, they have symbols, or, in hasbro's official terms, rump markings. Cutie mark belongs to G3 and G4. Not to G1.

Onto the main subject, some lines of thought here.

#1 It depends on how ponies are considered to be born. Take for example the My Little Pony UK comic. In issue 1 is the infamous story of baby ponies coming from the Magic Mirror. Later in the sequence, the original Newborn Twins first come about with a mix of Baby Lucky and co's drawings and baby Lucky's Happy Go lucky Friday 13th magic bringing them to life. So ponies do not have to be "born" in Ponyland, and it makes sense that, if they are created from magic, they might have particular features at that point of creation.

#2 BORN ponies. The only ponies we can say for sure are "born" are the twins that come with Surprise Twins Pony (my sister calls them Itsy and Bitsy). They are officially 'born' and they do not have symbols. That would make the case that actually born ponies (as opposed to magically created ones) are not born with symbols.

#3 In response to names and types of symbols, this makes me think of mediaeval Japanese culture and the trend of changing names as individuals reached certain points in their life. For example, there's a famous warrior, Yoshitsune, and that is how everyone knows him, but he was called Ushiwakamaru as a small child, then Shanaou I believe as an adolescent, then he had his coming of age ceremony in which he was given the name Yoshitsune, and then, at the end of his life, I believe he had changed his name again because the Regent's name was Yoshitsune and it was a mark of deference to do that. So people's identities were fluid. I see Baby Ponies in a similar vein. Who's to say that symbol and name stay the same throughout a pony's lifespan?

#4 Alternatively, baby ponies are actually past versions of the adult ponies in some kind of weird ponyland timewarp. Maybe that explains coming through the magic mirror; they're actually coming through a time gate from the past into the present, where they already exist as adults.

As for why 3/4 Embers have no symbol, I think that is just one of those genetic variations. Rainbow Magic (RC Ringlet) also has no symbol. She has stars beneath her wing and her wings are rainbow coloured, but nothing that Hasbro could rightly term a "rump marking". Pocket Friends ponies also have symbols on one side, but not on both. There are variations in this style across the G1 line, which would be in keeping with the variations that occur in the real world with different types of person and their particular features.

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: BlushingBlue on November 20, 2015, 02:58:18 AM
We also played that Baby Moondancer was Moondancer as a child, not Moondancer's filly.

This was my take on it when I was a kid too. When I first saw Baby Cotton Candy and company in the toy store, I thought it was just like the Muppet Babies, where it was still the same original character but as a baby. I only saw the occasional episode of the cartoon after it was well into syndication, and I never really paid that much attention to it. Initially, I assumed that certain ponies (like Lickety Split in the MLP Movie) were babies on the TV show for whatever reason, but didn't have a "mom" per se. I was pretty shocked when I first caught an episode with an identical mom and baby in it -- pretty sure it was the Heart Throbs in the Knight Shade story -- and I tried to rationalize that Adult Heart Throb was so worried about Baby Heart Throb because if she died as a baby that would retroactively erase her from existence. :lol: I may have been influenced by watching Back to the Future too many times.


The G4 take on "getting your cutie mark" doesn't sit quite right with me. It's a cute concept on the surface, but by making it such a big deal in the show, it unintentionally raises a lot of existential questions. For example: What if Donut Joe was adopted as a baby by the McColt clan and never saw a doughnut in his life? If cutie marks are "destined", would his family always wonder what was up with that weird pink lug nut? If cutie marks are"discovered", would he remain forever a blank flank because he never found his true calling? It seems cruel to burden someone with a symbol of a fate they have no hope of achieving or even understanding, and even worse to imply that they have no noteworthy traits at all. Maybe nurture would triumph over nature, and he would get a constructicon cutie mark instead. But then who can say that a doughnut cutie mark is even what he's supposed to have in the first place? If cutie marks are malleable, then they're not actually all that insightful. They're just a picture of whatever you happen to be really into when you're twelve, which isn't a very good rubric for a future career, otherwise you'd see a lot of people getting PhDs in pokemon training.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Taffeta on November 20, 2015, 03:10:44 AM

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!

The story is actually on my site on this page:
http://www.etherella.com/scrapbook2/mlp_comic.htm
The first story uploaded under 1985, it's a zip file :)
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: PoseyPetals on November 20, 2015, 03:33:37 AM
@Taffeta, thanks for the link! I'm going to read that magic mirror comic as I'd never heard of that explanation either!! I remember the owner of The Golden Autumn's theory was that baby ponies rolled out of some kind of birthing pool...?

As a kid, I remember just accepting the fact that there were duplicate adult and baby ponies, particularly in the shows and films, but then where is Ember's mother? Who is she? Is it Twilight? Who did Ember become? This is so existentialist! Yeah I need to read that mirror comic ~

But then, tiddleywinks and cuddles are also parentless...and then when an adult pony has an identical child, I feel like the identity/personality of the adult gets all screwed up e.g....Fizzy with a baby? I could never imagine Gusty or Lickety Split with baby ponies either, but in the shows they have them just the same - what also confused me was, if in the MLP movie Baby Lickety Split had a mother lickety split - and I'm sure I spotted her a few times in back - why is Buttons acting so much like a mother? What is mother lickety split doing about her lost child? AND If all the babies belong to the nursery do they not have individual parents? Do they just get collectively raised like bumblebees? I don't know? This is an amusing topic and I love reading everyone else's theories :)
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Leave a Whisper on November 20, 2015, 04:30:48 AM
@Taffeta-Thanks! I didn't know anything about the Magic Mirror either. So identical babies are from a mirror. Hard to keep the population going when the boys are racing around the world.

And then individual babies in the show, such as the newborn twins were a result of natural means, which gave them variety in symbols and they did indeed have mothers and really snotty siblings.

As far as the individual babies, perhaps they are orphans? I mean Ponyland is a dangerous place to live. You've got wizards and witches, demons and monsters and all kinds of other creatures out to enslave or destroy you, every week. It's reasonable to believe not all ponies make it and ponies are herd creatures, they will care for orphaned foals like their real life counterparts.

I also just remembered that there is a Magic Message pony named Cuddles, she could be Baby Cuddles mom?

Perhaps Ember was an orphan as well or maybe half Bright Valley pony like Prince-I mean Knight Shade?
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 20, 2015, 07:48:39 AM
My baby Cuddles was an orphan boy who was left on the other ponies' doorstep.  :P

As for G4, I feel like the symbols aren't predestined, but more like . . . when a pony finds something they're good at and accepts it as their special talent, it becomes their special talent.  How zen!  ;)
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: DappledHazel on November 20, 2015, 08:00:24 AM

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!

The story is actually on my site on this page:
http://www.etherella.com/scrapbook2/mlp_comic.htm
The first story uploaded under 1985, it's a zip file :)

That's cute.. But they should have at least given the babies different names.. So like, Firefly's baby is called Baby Firefly... Will Baby Firefly be called that even when she's grown up..? Or will there be two Fireflys?  :what:
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Al-1701 on November 20, 2015, 08:05:01 AM
In the comic, Baby Lickety-Split and FT Baby Lickety-Split are SEPARATE ponies.  They even appeared together in one story with the claim that they're cousins.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: ponyqueen on November 20, 2015, 08:07:58 AM
Maybe they call the baby ponies "Baby whatever" because of the previously mentioned perilous existence these ponies live. All manners of natural and magical fates could befall a young foal, so parents give a placeholder name until the youth survives to a given age.

In the wild, many prey animals have a 90% mortality rate during the first year of life. Even in human society, babies were not always named upon birth in communities with high infant mortality- they were simply called "Baby Girl" or "Baby Boy". Check out an old cemetery and you can see the tombstones bearing these placeholder names of children that did not thrive and ultimately succumbed at a young age.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Sunset on November 20, 2015, 08:11:17 AM

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!

The story is actually on my site on this page:
http://www.etherella.com/scrapbook2/mlp_comic.htm
The first story uploaded under 1985, it's a zip file :)

That's cute.. But they should have at least given the babies different names.. So like, Firefly's baby is called Baby Firefly... Will Baby Firefly be called that even when she's grown up..? Or will there be two Fireflys?  :what:

Maybe "Baby Firfly" isn't an actual name.  Maybe it's the same as calling them "baby Smith" or "baby Jones".  And then later they get their own actuall names.

To be honest, I never actually thought about it much as a child.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: DappledHazel on November 20, 2015, 08:15:27 AM

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!

The story is actually on my site on this page:
http://www.etherella.com/scrapbook2/mlp_comic.htm
The first story uploaded under 1985, it's a zip file :)

That's cute.. But they should have at least given the babies different names.. So like, Firefly's baby is called Baby Firefly... Will Baby Firefly be called that even when she's grown up..? Or will there be two Fireflys?  :what:

Maybe "Baby Firfly" isn't an actual name.  Maybe it's the same as calling them "baby Smith" or "baby Jones".  And then later they get their own actuall names.

To be honest, I never actually thought about it much as a child.

Okay, that makes sense.  :drunk:
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 20, 2015, 08:19:28 AM
Ah yes . . .

In the comic, Baby Lickety-Split and FT Baby Lickety-Split are SEPARATE ponies.  They even appeared together in one story with the claim that they're cousins.

Ah, yes . . .

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: ponyqueen on November 20, 2015, 08:35:42 AM
Ah yes . . .

In the comic, Baby Lickety-Split and FT Baby Lickety-Split are SEPARATE ponies.  They even appeared together in one story with the claim that they're cousins.

Ah, yes . . .

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


LOL!  :lol:
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: DappledHazel on November 20, 2015, 08:39:55 AM
Ah yes . . .

In the comic, Baby Lickety-Split and FT Baby Lickety-Split are SEPARATE ponies.  They even appeared together in one story with the claim that they're cousins.

Ah, yes . . .

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


She's Lickety-Split, she's Lickety-Split, you're Lickety-Split, and I'M LICKETY-SPLIT. Are there anymore Lickety-Split's I should know about? Sorry I had too :silly:
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Leave a Whisper on November 20, 2015, 08:40:56 AM

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!

The story is actually on my site on this page:
http://www.etherella.com/scrapbook2/mlp_comic.htm
The first story uploaded under 1985, it's a zip file :)

That's cute.. But they should have at least given the babies different names.. So like, Firefly's baby is called Baby Firefly... Will Baby Firefly be called that even when she's grown up..? Or will there be two Fireflys?  :what:

Maybe "Baby Firfly" isn't an actual name.  Maybe it's the same as calling them "baby Smith" or "baby Jones".  And then later they get their own actuall names.

To be honest, I never actually thought about it much as a child.

Then we shall call them Dr. Jones! Or maybe Firefly the II. I mean a knew a girl who had her mother and grandmother's name.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: DappledHazel on November 20, 2015, 08:43:59 AM

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!

The story is actually on my site on this page:
http://www.etherella.com/scrapbook2/mlp_comic.htm
The first story uploaded under 1985, it's a zip file :)

That's cute.. But they should have at least given the babies different names.. So like, Firefly's baby is called Baby Firefly... Will Baby Firefly be called that even when she's grown up..? Or will there be two Fireflys?  :what:

Maybe "Baby Firfly" isn't an actual name.  Maybe it's the same as calling them "baby Smith" or "baby Jones".  And then later they get their own actuall names.

To be honest, I never actually thought about it much as a child.

Then we shall call them Dr. Jones! Or maybe Firefly the II. I mean a knew a girl who had her mother and grandmother's name.
Lol. I call my baby Firefly 'baby Dragonfly'  :happy:
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: KarentheUnicorn on November 20, 2015, 08:54:47 AM

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!

The story is actually on my site on this page:
http://www.etherella.com/scrapbook2/mlp_comic.htm
The first story uploaded under 1985, it's a zip file :)

Dangit Taff, don't you know the only thing right and factual about MLP is whatever came from the USA and whatever is going on with G4 right now!! You can't throw out some UK comic stuff from the 80's and explode everybody's brain cells like that. (grin :lol:)

Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Leave a Whisper on November 20, 2015, 09:24:17 AM
Id say this was mind blown #1but the TE  Origin comic beat Mirror Clone Babies to it.  :lol:
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 20, 2015, 10:23:08 AM
Ah yes . . .

In the comic, Baby Lickety-Split and FT Baby Lickety-Split are SEPARATE ponies.  They even appeared together in one story with the claim that they're cousins.

Ah, yes . . .

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


She's Lickety-Split, she's Lickety-Split, you're Lickety-Split, and I'M LICKETY-SPLIT. Are there anymore Lickety-Split's I should know about? Sorry I had too :silly:

"Buy this toy, kids!  It's a different character than the Baby Lickety-Split you already have, we swear!"

Now I'm wondering what would have happened if the SS ponies had also been sold in the UK.

"I'm Gusty, and I'm looking for my cousin Gusty."

"I'm Cherries Jubilee and I'm looking for my sister Cherries Jubilee."

"I'm Shady and I'm looking for my great-aunt twice removed Shady."

"I'm Ribbon and I'm concerned."
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Taffeta on November 20, 2015, 10:58:28 AM

I didn't know all this theory about the magic mirror and it really makes sense!

The story is actually on my site on this page:
http://www.etherella.com/scrapbook2/mlp_comic.htm
The first story uploaded under 1985, it's a zip file :)

Dangit Taff, don't you know the only thing right and factual about MLP is whatever came from the USA and whatever is going on with G4 right now!! You can't throw out some UK comic stuff from the 80's and explode everybody's brain cells like that. (grin :lol:)



And how long, exactly, have you known me? *innocent*

Though in seriousness, the pony comic ran weekly or fortnightly for eight years. There were many more opportunities to insert all kinds of information that the TV show didn't. For example, Twinkle Eyed ponies as jewel mine slaves. We also had Merry Go Round ponies from the "Whispering Whirligig", Mountain Boys from Misty Mountain and such.

The biggest irony of the magic mirror is that the ponies it highlights weren't sold here. If it had been Blossom, Cotton Candy or Applejack, even Bow Tie, fine - but Glory and Firefly, who weren't sold here, and nor were their babies.


All the LicketySplitting makes me want to post the Lickety Split song, but that would be going off topic in a big way.

Going back ON topic, as I said before (and maybe LM has a scan, I am not sure I have the story on my page), Nibbles, Dibbles, Sniffles and Snookums (the only first set twins sold in the UK) came to be when they were drawn and brought to life on Friday 13th (I believe) with Baby Lucky's Happy Go Lucky magic.

Gypsy might also have been involved; her magic and Friday 13th often coincided, so I'm possibly mixing that bit up, but I am certain about the twins. SO identical babies come from a mirror and twin ponies from a Baby Pony's art homework.

I am trying to think about other pony arrivals. I am pretty sure a lot of the cards said things about them arriving in Ponyland. The Teeny Weeny ponies definitely all have on their card "one day four new ponies arrived in Ponyland." And that is the explanation. They have no parents, they just arrive. The Newborn Ponies do it too - it begins with Yoyo and Dangles, I think, and again, they're unchaperoned. Whereas the Rainbow Baby Ponies belong to the Rainbow Curl ponies, at least as their guardians, as they all live on Rainbow Mountain. ("they call it their Rainbow Nursery") I have all these cards scanned but they're not on my web server and I'm sadly in the wrong place to upload links.

@LM - remember that the UK comic didn't mind introducing ponies that weren't sold here, so original Gusty already did appear. Gusty in terms of Movie Star Gusty is probably when Nurse Gusty replaces Nurse Cotton Candy (albeit Gusty was more of a baby pony nurse and Cotton Candy more of a medic)...By the time of Yoyo and Dangles there wasn't a Nurse Pony but I remember Caramel Crunch did a lot of babysitting.

I am also going with the theory that most of these things are Shady's hallucinations through her glasses. I include in that, obviously, Baby Shady, as she also didn't exist here, yet got a lot of story time in the acid trip world of the Shady family.
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: KarentheUnicorn on November 20, 2015, 01:40:22 PM


And how long, exactly, have you known me? *innocent*

(hehe) ummm, lets put it this way. The people who were born the year we started chatting online are probably graduated from High School :shocked:

Quote
Though in seriousness, the pony comic ran weekly or fortnightly for eight years. There were many more opportunities to insert all kinds of information that the TV show didn't. For example, Twinkle Eyed ponies as jewel mine slaves. We also had Merry Go Round ponies from the "Whispering Whirligig", Mountain Boys from Misty Mountain and such.

Sadly, no comics for me. And that I was into ponies before the cartoon, I just assumed the baby ponies were the children of the adult ponies. I actually at one time had all my baby ponies in front of the ponies they most looked like - so I sorta sorted my ponies into families. Plus it was pre-bigbrother. So some of my female ponies actually had to be male. Sorry Firefly, you're a boy! :p

Quote
The biggest irony of the magic mirror is that the ponies it highlights weren't sold here. If it had been Blossom, Cotton Candy or Applejack, even Bow Tie, fine - but Glory and Firefly, who weren't sold here, and nor were their babies.

It's a bit weird. Kind of wonder if they meant to sell it over here?? or why they would show ponies that you couldn't buy in the UK. Here, look, ponies you can't have...kinda evil :p

Curious, where were the comics designed? Was it does in the UK, the art and such? I don't know a lot about the comics other than what I've learned from you or what little bit I've seen when people discuss it and I happen into the thread. Kinda wonder, clearly the artist had access to what ponies looked like that were not sold in the UK, so makes me wonder where the art/concepts were coming from.












Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: Taffeta on November 20, 2015, 01:47:38 PM
The comics are UK designed, produced, written etc. Though some of the artwork was also used in Europe, I am pretty sure it began here, and the style is different from that seen in US book illustrations and such.

Because Scandinavia got ponies like Powder on a card marked Hasbro UK and in the same style of art that matches other pony cards sold here, the theory is we were going to have them but ultimately the idea got scrapped. So lots of the early ponies made our stories and merchandise, but not shelves. As we didn't have Italian ponies either, I think we were the only country in Europe who did not get those characters except in our stories (they were in our story books too).
Title: Re: Are ponies born with cutie marks? (G1)
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 20, 2015, 07:55:25 PM
The art for the UK comics was drawn by a Spanish company, Selecciones Ilustradas, which would fax it over.  The writers were UK based, though.
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal