Equestria Girls basic dolls with partly molded mane

[CupidStrikes]

I think the blue one is supposed to be Trixie - note the lilac eyes and the crescent-y shaped cutie mark under her eye. Not that her clothes match Trixie but it wouldn't be the first time Hasbro have clearly not bothered to tell the team designing the merchandise anything about the characters and thus you get toys with clothing and accessories that are completely unrelated to that character.

I call McDonalds toys, or something that will end up in £ stores. Also, hey, Hasbro, whilst your product's thing is "We're different and that's good" how's about giving them something other than high heels and miniskirts? Or do you mean "You can be different, but no not that different"? Makes me so mad that the toyline completely disregards one of the core messages in MLP: FiM/EqG 

[Carrehz]

Wow. I just.. wow. I don't even know what to say about these things.

[Magdalen]

um .... yikes.  I'm much more of a doll collector now than ponies (plus g4 does little for me) and I really dislike the molded/plastic clothes.  So cheap looking.

[zombienixon]

um .... yikes.  I'm much more of a doll collector now than ponies (plus g4 does little for me) and I really dislike the molded/plastic clothes.  So cheap looking.

That's probably because they're supposed to be cheap.

[Lucky_Ladybug]

I'm pretty sure the blue one is a very lazy Rainbow Dash; the mark under her eye looks like a lightning bolt, and the shirt has a lightning bolt design too. Plus the fact that if you follow the provided link, it shows it's supposed to be Rainbow Dash via the box.

Bleh. I am very not impressed. I echo the comment that I hope these aren't replacing the dolls already out. They are very lazy and blah. Plastic clothes were bad enough; now it's plastic hair and invisible shoes, too. **headdesk.**

[MintyMyndi]

She's even shown in box at the other end of that link, and it says "Rainbow Dash." Ugh. The sculpts are pretty nice though.

[octocorn]

Oh good, dolls with mullets.  I always wanted one of those. Said no one ever.

[Foxtale]

They look like McDonald's toys.

That was my first thought too. Unless they are really tiny. Like pocket EQG toys

[Sprinklecupcake]

My first thought: MCDONALDS!!! Oh boy, I hope they are!!! These look too low-quality to be sold retail but they are still CUTE!!! I fedl sooo guilty as I have yet to pick up ANY of the EQG dolls from Rainbow Rocks :-( theres sooooooo many alteady I cant even keep up!

Post Merge: September 02, 2014, 10:16:50 PM

Edit: just sae them in the packaging.... not Mcdonalds :-(

[Dreamer]

In ALL the toystores I visited, You can buy an EQG doll and get another for free. And let's say they aren't flying off the shelves. I'm pretty sure that these gals will share the same fate

[Lucky_Ladybug]

Oh good, dolls with mullets.  I always wanted one of those. Said no one ever.

LOL!

[shimmlight]

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[HelloGoodbye]

I bet these are minis meant to compete with the other mini budget lines that lots of doll lines are doing right now.  Moxie Girlz did one, and some others did, too.  They are like under $5 and don't have accessories or extras and simple packaging.  I think that is what these three are. 

[TWILIGHTCOOKIE]

My only question to Hasbro: Why make such detailed shoes if you ain't going to paint them with detail? I think McDonald's toys actually have more detail than these. I'm glad I don't buy into this line of toys, MH look more tempting with their detail.

[Wardah]

I'm wondering if they made these so they could have a doll that costs the same price as the brushables.