I think that all toy stores should be arranged by theme rather than 'girls' and 'boys'. Not all parents have the confidence to go against social norms in order to bring up kids as comfortable in themselves as some of your parents did. 'Boys' toys are either fighting, building or vehicles and 'girls' toys are baby dolls and cuddly toys and cooking stations and pretend make up kits - and most children
will be affected by this.
I see evidence of it daily - so many parents saying "oh no, you can't have that, it's for girls" etc. The majority of British kids I see are either 'strong', 'clever' boys or 'beautiful', 'princess' girls (this includes my brothers' children). I'm afraid that while this seems harmless, it feeds into the long standing ideas that men should be competitive and smart and strong and women should be good-looking and demure and homely. After all, men
do still get higher earning jobs and women (at least in Britain) still do the vast majority of housework and childcare (
even if they have jobs too!)
I saw a documentary recently in which they were talking to a female firefighter and she still gets so much prejudice about it, both from other firefighters and from the public -with some people implying that they wouldn't want to rely on
her to save them from a fire
. We really do need to finally start breaking down these barriers at the level of society, starting with how our children dress and play, so that boys and girls can both grow up to be strong, gentle, smart, beautiful and most importantly, EQUAL.
That's how I feel about it anyway.
ps: I couldn't help noticing that in the article, they mentioned that Harrods still puts their male workers in blue and female workers in pink.
" "We are not stopping our female members of staff wearing a boy T-shirt, should they want to," he said, adding: "Although they are a different cut."
So there was no gender connotations whatsoever in the choice? "No, none at all." "