We've done a huge purge on accounts that haven't been touched in over 5 years! If you're a returning member and can't login please email mlpchief @ gmail.com for more details!
Site Announcements Arena Tutorials Sigs & Site Support Introductions Pony Corral Swap Talk! Pony Fairs! MLP Nirvana Nirvana Sales Pony Brag Arena Off Topic Dollhouse Toy Box & Games Cupboard Customs Custom Sales Arts & Crafts Corral Adoptables For Sale - For Auction For Trade Wanted Trader & Classifieds Support What's Your Problem Private Messages Contact Us!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Judging whether or not 35 is close to 50 and deciding at what age something is "vintage" of "antique" is kind of a matter of opinion. I think your argument might go on until G1s are definitely described as archeological artifacts.
Quote from: Nemesis on May 13, 2018, 10:59:21 AMQuote from: Leave a Whisper on May 13, 2018, 10:54:01 AMAnd I said they're not even considerd nearly. Funny, all I need do is type in requirement age for vintage and it pops up as 20 years. That sure sounds like a definitive age to me.15 years isn’t much, IMO. If you thinnk it is, that’s fine, since “much” and “nearly” are also completely arbitrary.Any strict age requirement for “vintage” isn’t in the actual definition of the word. I literally just gave you the dictionary definition.I have no problem with debating an opinion. But you have been rather uncivil to me, calling my statements “silly” and “hyperbole”.Silly and hyperbole isn't an insult. If i were being uncivil and rude to you, trust me, you'd know it. As I'm not always the nicest person and I'm quite mouthy and uncouth.If you think that someone calmly pointing out that 35 years isn't close to 50 or 100 is rude, uncivil or catty, then I don't know what to say to that.
Quote from: Leave a Whisper on May 13, 2018, 10:54:01 AMAnd I said they're not even considerd nearly. Funny, all I need do is type in requirement age for vintage and it pops up as 20 years. That sure sounds like a definitive age to me.15 years isn’t much, IMO. If you thinnk it is, that’s fine, since “much” and “nearly” are also completely arbitrary.Any strict age requirement for “vintage” isn’t in the actual definition of the word. I literally just gave you the dictionary definition.I have no problem with debating an opinion. But you have been rather uncivil to me, calling my statements “silly” and “hyperbole”.
And I said they're not even considerd nearly. Funny, all I need do is type in requirement age for vintage and it pops up as 20 years. That sure sounds like a definitive age to me.
Really now? Tone can sometimes be hard to intrepet on the internet. I did not call you names, nor have I exploded in a fit of petty anger at you. Kindly do not acuse me of being uncivil, rude or catty unless I actually am being rude. Perhaps you should go look up the definition of silly. Its not an insult.
Definition of sillysillier; silliest1 archaic : helpless, weak2 a : rustic, plainb obsolete : lowly in station : humble3 a : weak in intellect : foolishb : exhibiting or indicative of a lack of common sense or sound judgment a very silly mistakec : trifling, frivolous
The flocking is one of the most valued thing in a pony for me, if i could, id flock all of them
I kinda thought I might be the only person in the world who loves flocking. I wonder why they never make flocked ponies anymore? It still seems popular in other toy lines, like Shopkins.
I don't come across a modern flocking toy very often if at all anymore and in my personal opinion, it really seems like hasbro has been cutting corners at every possibility on the G4 MLP toys and personally,, they're even pretty creepy looking
Quote from: splooto on May 13, 2018, 03:26:50 PMI don't come across a modern flocking toy very often if at all anymore and in my personal opinion, it really seems like hasbro has been cutting corners at every possibility on the G4 MLP toys and personally,, they're even pretty creepy looking O ya... >.> I hope G5 has more to offer than G4. I wish it was still about the pony toys themselves and not the show. >.< Used to be that the cartoon promoted the toys, now the toys promote the cartoon, and badly, at that, since they only seem to like to release the Mane 6, and occasionally very-hard-to-find backgrounders. (I don't keep up with the shows or comics anymore, I tried at first, but I've taken peeks at the original characters from them and it hurts my heart that they don't even bother trying to make toys of them, I bet they'd sell like hotcakes. I want those damn Norse ponies from the comics, BADLY. >.>) That is one of my unpopular opinions, I guess, if that is one- I really hate the whole FiM show thing and the stereotypes/culture around it, and the fact they try to make it more pop-culture than it already is. They hardly look like ponies to me, I really don't like Americanized-Anime flair they tried to give it (Don't get me wrong I love anime, but ponies should be separate imo)- and it's sad to see Hasbro doing everything possible to make the ponies as cheap as humanly possible to save as many pennies as they possibly can, which is ultimately running the line into the ground. I miss all the creativity, thought, and uniqueness that went into MLP.
I like the name Princess Tiffany, even though I don't usually like human names for animals.
Quote from: RoseNoire on May 13, 2018, 11:18:35 AMJudging whether or not 35 is close to 50 and deciding at what age something is "vintage" of "antique" is kind of a matter of opinion. I think your argument might go on until G1s are definitely described as archeological artifacts.Archaeological is 1 million years from now when archaeologists dig them up and deduce that little girls were involved in some kind of ancient, widespread, horse-cult.
I kinda dont like any of the gen 4 play sets, they are kinda boring to me.
If someone doesn’t agree with my aforementioned feelings on whether 35 is close to 50