If you have an old account and cannot remember how to log in, please contact us at mlpchief @ gmail.com. Additionally, if you want a different screen name, please contact us instead of making a new account! Thanks!
Site Announcements Arena Tutorials Sigs & Site Support Introductions Pony Corral Swap Talk! Pony Fairs! MLP Nirvana Nirvana Sales Pony Brag Arena Off Topic Dollhouse Toy Box & Games Cupboard Customs Custom Sales Arts & Crafts Corral Adoptables For Sale - For Auction For Trade Wanted Trader & Classifieds Support What's Your Problem Private Messages Contact Us!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The thing is, as much as Disney has a reputation for evil queens, there are only two in the canon, both based on their source material. One of them wasn't so much evil as insane. However, because the other was the first Disney cinematic villain ever, it's what everyone thinks of. There are have been at least as many pirates with prosthetic limbs that have served as canon Disney villains.And it does not that good queens don't seem to do much. Elsa is our first ruling queen who is a main character.I chalk it up to the same thing that has colored William Shatner's career. Yes, he can be a ham, but he's not half the ham pop culture would have you believe. Likewise, Disney has a couple evil queens, but it's not crawling with them like pop culture would have you believe.
I meeeeean, yeah there've been a couple good Disney queens, but the ones who are actual 'characters' (like, not bit parts like "Princess Aurora's mom") are mostly evil. Even Elsa was originally intended to "turn evil", until they reworked the script.And I think that's part of it: "princess" is also just more marketable. "Queen" still means "political ruler" most of the time (unless we are talking about drama queens or drag queens, LOL), but "princess" has become shorthand for "pure-hearted, kind, beautiful, generous girl." That's why there are shirts for little girls that read "I'm a PRINCESS!" or "Daddy's little princess." There are no shirts that say "Daddy's little queen."I think part of the appeal of "princess" to little girls is it sort of suggests you get all the leisure of royal life, all the positive attention, you can help your subjects by being good and gracious . . . but you don't have a lot of the responsibilities. (Although in MLP, both past and present, being a princess DOES carry responsibility . . . It's definitely is a political position, which I like. Ain't nothing wrong with responsibility!)In G3 "Every pony becomes a princess" with the Crystal Princess line . . . They didn't try for "Every pony becomes a queen." And even though G1 had Majesty, her toy was only sold for about three years. After which Hasbro sold at least 20 princess ponies.But like I said, I totally support more "queen" ponies. To be honest the whole "princess equals good-hearted girl <3" thing kind of annoys me. It would be cool if a future generation had multiple pony-run countries, each with its own king or queen.
It's strange that they decided to leave her out of all the G1 animation, even RaMC and EfC when the castle was being sold. Unless they thought Spike plus the Castle being in the cartoon was enough advertising for that set?
Guys, the type of Queen I'm referring to is the LGBT+ term, not the actual mother of a Princess......(although I would question whether Hasbro would have the cajones to make a Queen a Queen)
Ohhh, like drag queens?I know they aren't 'officially', but my headcanon is that the G1 Dance 'n Prance ponies are drag queens.
Queens, as in the place?
Quote from: Loa on July 04, 2018, 05:51:23 PMQueens, as in the place?my sincerest apologies. I thought I padded the op out with very clear connotations.