The MLP Arena

Pony Talk => Pony Corral => Topic started by: Kitcatepic on April 23, 2024, 07:45:28 AM

Title: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Kitcatepic on April 23, 2024, 07:45:28 AM
there are so many instances in g5 where it feels like they are trying to sell toys but then don't

they went out of their way to give all the dragons names when most of them are pretty much just background characters with no development they also made the dragons more pony like and even though it was stated that it was just because they wanted to reuse the pony rig for the dragons it also makes them look a lot more toyetic as a result it seems like they were using the dragons to sell toys yet they only made one of them as a toy as far as we know

the auracorns and blue thunders (or whatever that one pegasus band was called I dont remember) have a design similar to that one mane 5 set with the translucent glitter plastic but they don't have any toys made of them at all

ruby jubilee seems like the kind of character to have one of those talking/singing princess type toys made of her (similar to pipp/songbird serenade) and her design is really pretty but all we got for bridlewoodstock was just some dress up toys of the main five

they brought back the breezies for pretty much no reason they were always made to sell toys but they did nothing in terms of toys with them and the show would be pretty much the same without them the night market could have just been a unicorn thing

posey/the dreamlands are a pretty easy nostalgia cash in but no toys were really made of them (I know there is a mini world magic posey but im talking about mainline toys) posey played a huge role in the first make your mark special and it almost seemed like she was going to be a main character for a minute until misty showed up but she does not even get a basic brushable 

why is hasbro trying to sell us nonexistent toys
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don\'t
Post by: dippindot on April 23, 2024, 09:27:53 AM
I'm not even a g5 fan but if they would just put some toys on the shelves they could convert me


Post Merge: April 23, 2024, 09:29:24 AM

Do I like the g5 toy style? No. Do I want to purchase 1000 different new brushable pony and or dragon toys, unbox them and brush their hair? Absofreakinglutely
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Leave a Whisper on April 23, 2024, 09:37:50 AM
All of G5.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Ponybookworm on April 23, 2024, 11:51:21 AM
This is the main problem with G5: so many characters, so few toys of them. It was also an issue with G4, & G3 didn't even make Spike, let alone half the unicorns & a quarter of the pegasi...

Even G1's Tales didn't have every character made. The most common G1 Customs are of Teddy, Lancer, Ace, & Miss Hackney, so what does that tell you???

Hasbro
Should
Not
Feature
Characters
Without
Making
Toys
Of
Them

Because if they did make toys of more characters, they'd fly off the shelves!!!
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Carrehz on April 24, 2024, 03:15:38 PM
Dippindot, you took the words out of my mouth!

Also SO many G4 characters. I still can't believe we never got a brushable Babs Seed. Or Fleur de Lis. The princess moulds always seemed popular so I'm sure Fleur would've sold well?? since she just used Luna's model but without wings.

(Also I typed this up earlier but apparently forgot to hit post? oops :blush:)
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: dippindot on April 24, 2024, 06:50:46 PM
Fleur de Lis would have been so good!
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Ponybookworm on April 25, 2024, 06:00:23 PM
Dippindot, you took the words out of my mouth!

Also SO many G4 characters. I still can't believe we never got a brushable Babs Seed. Or Fleur de Lis. The princess moulds always seemed popular so I'm sure Fleur would've sold well?? since she just used Luna's model but without wings.

(Also I typed this up earlier but apparently forgot to hit post? oops :blush:)
KIRINS!!! And yaks, & more Hippogriffs, & more griffons!!!
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: dippindot on April 25, 2024, 07:40:37 PM
KIRINS!!! And yaks, & more Hippogriffs, & more griffons!!!

Kirins!!! I wanted Kirins and griffons so much
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: kingluke on April 26, 2024, 08:12:46 AM
G4 Lighting dust and the other washouts. There is plenty of wonderbolt stuff.

Plus the fashion designers Rarity recrutes : Lilly Lace, Star streak and Inky rose.

And the two unicorns from canterlot : Sunshine Smiles and Moonlight Raven.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Carrehz on April 26, 2024, 08:30:41 AM
Even G1's Tales didn't have every character made. The most common G1 Customs are of Teddy, Lancer, Ace, & Miss Hackney, so what does that tell you???

YES!!!! I can't believe this has never been rectified!!!
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Taffeta on April 26, 2024, 09:19:44 AM
Even G1's Tales didn't have every character made. The most common G1 Customs are of Teddy, Lancer, Ace, & Miss Hackney, so what does that tell you???

YES!!!! I can't believe this has never been rectified!!!

My mother saw Sunny Starscout for the first time today. She is still struggling to understand a: how that is the core key pony character, and b: how there is literally no variety. Her response I think was actually, "ew!". And this is the person who bought me my first pony when I was a kid because she thought they were so pretty.

G5 suffers badly from variety and a bad choice of colour schemes for the main cast.

As for the Tales ponies, 100% agree.

There's also Lady Lessons who I feel was going to exist but then didn't.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Kitcatepic on April 26, 2024, 10:15:55 AM
Even G1's Tales didn't have every character made. The most common G1 Customs are of Teddy, Lancer, Ace, & Miss Hackney, so what does that tell you???

YES!!!! I can't believe this has never been rectified!!!

My mother saw Sunny Starscout for the first time today. She is still struggling to understand a: how that is the core key pony character, and b: how there is literally no variety. Her response I think was actually, "ew!". And this is the person who bought me my first pony when I was a kid because she thought they were so pretty.

G5 suffers badly from variety and a bad choice of colour schemes for the main cast.

As for the Tales ponies, 100% agree.

There's also Lady Lessons who I feel was going to exist but then didn't.

agreed I like bright saturated colors but something about the g5 palette just turns me off I don't even know how to put it into words the g5 ponies just don't look as pretty as the mane six
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Carrehz on April 26, 2024, 12:57:03 PM
Tbh I'd prefer Lady Lessons over Miss Hackney. I haven't really read anything w/ LL or seen that much of Tales so I don't have any "personal" stake in it... I just think Lady Lessons is cuter :B

Kitcatepic I know exactly what you mean!! Even though I'm not a huge G4 fan, and I'm as sick of the main 6 as anyone, their colours were so pretty together, both as a group and like, how their colours coordinated individually, if that makes sense? I'm not sure how to phrase it either but I definitely agree with you that G5's palette seems less.... something.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Taffeta on April 27, 2024, 12:00:29 PM
Tbh I'd prefer Lady Lessons over Miss Hackney. I haven't really read anything w/ LL or seen that much of Tales so I don't have any "personal" stake in it... I just think Lady Lessons is cuter :B

Kitcatepic I know exactly what you mean!! Even though I'm not a huge G4 fan, and I'm as sick of the main 6 as anyone, their colours were so pretty together, both as a group and like, how their colours coordinated individually, if that makes sense? I'm not sure how to phrase it either but I definitely agree with you that G5's palette seems less.... something.

I would rather have LL too, just because I'm sure the school should have been her playset, and then ultimately wasn't. Though I do wonder if they migrated her colours and used them for Love Token instead...

I actually like quite a few G4 figures, although I'm sick of the Mane 6 and I don't like FIM. They may not have been super horsey but they were cute, and some had really nice colour schemes.

I don't think the G5 (and this may be true for some G4) pony palette choice is helped by the decision to make the packages dark pink/purple/magenta and white. It is especially bad with Sunny though, given her hair colour and the boldness of her body. The one we saw yesterday was far from the ugliest Sunny I've seen, but she looked hemmed in by the colours of her packaging and it didn't really sell her well.

Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Snapdragon on April 28, 2024, 02:51:06 AM
I mean, they're just following the G4 playbook! Create dozens of named, interesting background characters, and then only release some of them, ever, often only in blindbag form. Hippogriffs got two toys, and it was a battle to even find them. Buffalos, griffons, dragons, breezies, changelings - you could rattle off so many important characters who had entire seasons devoted to them, and some of them never even got toys. Like, the entire last few seasons focused on the School of Friendship - we never got an Ocellus, a Yona, an Ember toy, and they were main characters! Make that make sense!

It feels like a continuing letdown with G5, because they are adding new species and characters SO early by comparison, and yet we are still stuck on the same Mane Six/core character release nonsense. I want more dragon toys! They clearly have the molds for them, so I don't see a lot of reason why they couldn't just release more colors of the same figure.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Moonbreeze on April 28, 2024, 04:25:25 AM
G2 Proudfoot, featured in this comic:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


And I agree on almost everything G4 and G5. It needs some variety in the toys. There is so much they could (have) gotten from the Tv shows! I would have bought so much more :/
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: DreamvalleyMLP on April 28, 2024, 04:45:44 AM
I don't care for G5, but as for G1 I think it's blasphemous that we never got a Moochick figure  :rant:

I never got 'round to it but I've always wanted to customize a poseable Happy doll from Snow White into a Moochick; with some minor resculpting it shouldn't be too hard I think. He seems to come very close already as is.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: WingedDragon on April 28, 2024, 07:40:03 AM
I strongly believe G5 meant to have a lot of toys, but the first few ones sell so bad, they started to make bad decisions such as releasing Mane 6 in G5 style and then add in Minty, because immortal Minty is a meme. Instead of having faith in the new characters they have, the toys exes just think hard for the characters that will most likely to sell. They turn away G5 fans who want their favourite charactets and annoy G4 fans who think G5 look weird.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Carrehz on April 28, 2024, 09:18:26 AM
WingedDragon, I think you're right :( It really does seem like instead of wondering WHY the first few toys didn't sell, they just went "Oh well, we'll just pull out the old stand-bys, people always want Minty"... like, just assuming cuz Minty's popular that people will just mindlessly buy her up... stuff like that.
(alright, to be fair, when I saw that set I DID think "Okay, I might be tempted by this one if it turns up over here", but... xD still!!!)

I wish they'd try more G5 characters instead of redoing the "G4 model" as Snapdragon said... I mean, I don't like G5 much. I don't like the style. But I felt that way about G4 for AGES too and then eventually it grew on me! So maybe G5 could grow on me too if they'd only give it a chance. Because my other main problems with G5 are a) ENDLESS SUNNY and b) poor distribution/same few things everywhere. Maybe if we had less Sunny (and... Izzy? Izzy's the purple unicorn right?) and more of a variety of characters then I might be more interested in it.. Gah, I dunno. I'm rambling, sorry.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: TarkanDragon on May 02, 2024, 12:08:41 PM
Y'know, I want to say this from the top of my lungs.

The characters that should have toys in my opinion which it would be these guys:

1. Weston (G1) - Reason: he goes so well with Spike (G1).
2. Student/Creature/Young Six - Reason: Did they really forget that they made ton of Spike figures yet no proper toys for these creatures. (I'd really like for a Smolder toy even so)
3. Most of MLP's minor characters (Like Ember, Garble, Thorax, etc.) - Reason: may not be needed but I'd thought it would be a good thing to add.
4. Whimsey Weatherbe - Reason: Even though she is a part-villian, she is a great character that should've made a toy.


I think these are my top picks. Although I was going to like include the Bushwoolies cousins and such but apperently there are prototype models of them so out of the question for that. unless if it counts.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: lalalei2001 on May 02, 2024, 12:40:28 PM
I always wanted villain toys. Strawberry Shortcake was lucky to have them!
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Kitcatepic on May 03, 2024, 07:18:55 AM
The moondreamers also had villan toys it seems like it was more common for villans to get toys back then
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Carrehz on May 03, 2024, 08:56:39 AM
I think the Furbobs count. I want them too!

I'd love toys of the cartoon characters like Knight Shade, the witches, Tirac, the bees (I would kill for a Sting toy!), etc. Definitely a missed opportunity there.
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: DreamvalleyMLP on May 03, 2024, 10:56:06 AM
I think the Furbobs count. I want them too!

They came so close! Prototypes and everything
Title: Re: characters that should have toys but don't
Post by: Ponybookworm on May 04, 2024, 02:44:17 AM
I think the Furbobs count. I want them too!

I'd love toys of the cartoon characters like Knight Shade, the witches, Tirac, the bees (I would kill for a Sting toy!), etc. Definitely a missed opportunity there.
DEFFO Furbobs!!!
I think this says enough about how much I want Knightshade!!!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 (https://www.hqg1c.net/gallery/Personal-album-of-Ponybookworm/knightshade1-pic_143.htm)
Tirac would have been awesome!!!! Witch dolls too
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal