Welcome to the MLP Arena!
Site Announcements Arena Tutorials Sigs & Site Support Introductions Pony Corral Swap Talk! Pony Fairs! MLP Nirvana Nirvana Sales Pony Brag Arena Off Topic Dollhouse Toy Box & Games Cupboard Customs Custom Sales Arts & Crafts Corral Adoptables For Sale - For Auction For Trade Wanted Trader & Classifieds Support What's Your Problem Private Messages Contact Us!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I have no problems with the Big Brothers at all. I'm just happy that they made boy ponies.
Released around the same time as the Adventure Boy/Big Brother Pony first set (reliable UK sources say before, and indeed they appear on an earlier insert dated 1987 than the Brother Ponies), these six ponies did not come with hats or bandanas.
And some people say FiM has a lack of boy ponies, bah! Total lies. Theres tons of males in FiM, just a few less than there is mares, not a huge difference.
So... you don't like the name or that they are separate from the other ponies?Remember that this was a toy line aimed at little girls. They were probably just trying to make the name appealing and assumed they wouldn't sell well to the target market.
The name "Big Brother" has always made me a bit uncomfortable, too, but that's because I over-think children's toys. There are mother ponies and there are baby ponies, but there are few male ponies specifically labeled as "daddy" ponies (and we know exactly who their children and mates are, as they all came as a set). Who are the big brothers related to, sibling-wise? Where did baby ponies like baby Gusty and baby Sundance come from? Do the ponies all practice incest? These questions are, of course, rhetorical because I don't think we really want to think too deeply about this subject. But that, of course, is why I personally protest the name "Big Brother." On the other hand, though, I do love male ponies. I love the way they look, even if they do perpetuate a stereotype that men are bigger and stronger than women.