The MLP Arena

Pony Talk => Pony Corral => Topic started by: jillrose on November 14, 2021, 05:13:37 PM

Title: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: jillrose on November 14, 2021, 05:13:37 PM
Hi pony friends!

Quick question: I'm interested in getting into resin crafting, because I love things like custom Li'l Litters babies and custom Petite Ponies.  I've seen resin artists producing these for sale, and am interested in creating some of my own - sales, TBD! :)

However, my only concern is whether or not commercial reproduction of Hasbro's design violates any design patents?? Or, have their patents on these early 90s toys long since expired? 

I guess I'm hoping there may be a MLP fan here who is also a laywer :)
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Cobblestone on November 14, 2021, 07:12:50 PM
At least one person is already doing this (Clipper) so while I’m not personally sure, it would seem hasbro hasn’t been bothered enough by it to take action? Or perhaps removing the hasbro mark puts reproductions into a gray area because hasbro has always been fine with the customizing community, as far as I know.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: BlackCurtains on November 15, 2021, 05:01:02 AM
Someone has been making full sized resin G1 customs for years and as far as I know, never ran into an issue.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Carrehz on November 15, 2021, 07:21:46 AM
I can think of a few folks who have reproduced accessories and such, too. I think it's one of those things where they turn a blind eye to it, as long as it stays small and doesn't get to the point where it would actually threaten Hasbro's toy sales... I'm no lawyer though so don't quote me on that x)

There are a LOT of third-party Transformers too, I don't think Hasbro have ever shut any of those guys down?
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: goddessofpeep on November 15, 2021, 07:32:11 AM
I am NOT a lawyer, or an expert on copyright law, but I once watched a video about this issue that involved bootleg Star Wars toys. The general theme of the video is that usually the toy manufacturers do have the rights to all forms of the toys, and could sue, but they tend to turn a mostly blind eye to fan works most of the time.  The general consensus is that  as long as the fans don’t cross certain boundaries, the toy manufacturers will leave things mostly alone since going after fans is costly, time consuming, and creates horrifically bad PR with their core customers.   

The most common boundaries that would make a manufacturer take notice are:
 
1) Creating something that “defiles” the brand - an example of this is when Hasbro went after a popular G4 website that was joking about…inappropriate touching of children. Hasbro didn’t want their brand associated with that, especially since it was popular enough to be a top hit when searching “My Little Pony” on google, and children and parents were seeing it. They also killed a Street Fighter style fighting game with G4 characters probably for the same reason.

2) Mass producing something close enough to the official brand, and in enough numbers to be a direct competitor to the official brand.  I think Clipper’s G1 retro line skirts this a bit, but as the ponies are G1, and they are going for a completely different market than the official ones in stores, Hasbro lets it slide.  Should Clipper start making toys from the current generation of MLP in direct competition to what Hasbro is currently making, odds are Hasbro would take notice.
The same is probably true of the people making replacement accessories.  Hasbro is currently not making anything similar, so they ignore it. However, if Hasbro decided one day to start making official replacement G1 Princess wands and Sea Pony shells, they’d probably shut down all those etsy sellers asap.

3) The person making the items doesn’t try to trademark their work, or attempt to assert a copyright claim on the manufacturer’s intellectual property.  The copyrights belong to the toy manufacturers, and trying to claim otherwise will force a reaction from the company’s lawyers.  Copyright holders must defend their copyrights or risk losing them, so this is an almost guaranteed way to trigger a reaction from the copyright owners.

So basically Hasbro owns My Little Pony in all its forms, but Hasbro is reluctant to try to stamp out every fan work out there due to the hassle(it’s like playing Whack-A-Mole), and the outrage it causes with its customers.  Hasbro may or may not have lost its specific copyrights on the original physical G1 moulds, but they still own the My Little Pony name, and everything using that name. So they can *potentially* come after anyone making and selling things using the My Little Pony name, but they generally don’t unless the copyright violations in question are more egregious than the average.  They still have the right to, though usually they start with a cease and desist letter instead of the full lawsuit for damages.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: jillrose on November 15, 2021, 08:45:22 AM
This is all very helpful stuff!! Thanks so much everyone  :lol:
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: jillrose on November 16, 2021, 03:00:57 PM
At least one person is already doing this (Clipper) so while I’m not personally sure, it would seem hasbro hasn’t been bothered enough by it to take action? Or perhaps removing the hasbro mark puts reproductions into a gray area because hasbro has always been fine with the customizing community, as far as I know.

Who is Clipper - how can I contact her? :) Is s/he here on the forum, and/or HQG1C?
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: lovesbabysquirmy on November 16, 2021, 03:53:58 PM
At least one person is already doing this (Clipper) so while I’m not personally sure, it would seem hasbro hasn’t been bothered enough by it to take action? Or perhaps removing the hasbro mark puts reproductions into a gray area because hasbro has always been fine with the customizing community, as far as I know.

Who is Clipper - how can I contact her? :) Is s/he here on the forum, and/or HQG1C?

Clipper is a He :)

here is the subforum: http://mlparena.com/index.php/board,199.0.html

a good conversation thread:  http://mlparena.com/index.php/topic,397529.0.html
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 16, 2021, 08:40:54 PM
Hi pony friends!

Quick question: I'm interested in getting into resin crafting, because I love things like custom Li'l Litters babies and custom Petite Ponies.  I've seen resin artists producing these for sale, and am interested in creating some of my own - sales, TBD! :)

However, my only concern is whether or not commercial reproduction of Hasbro's design violates any design patents?? Or, have their patents on these early 90s toys long since expired? 

I guess I'm hoping there may be a MLP fan here who is also a laywer :)


First, I'm not a lawyer so there are just based on my own fandom observations.  ;)

Is it strictly legal?  No.  But will Hasbro care?  Probably not!  There are so many third party Transformers toy companies that BigBadToystore has it's own category for them and I've never heard of Hasbro moving against them. And let me tell you, a lot of them are really blatant.  Like it will LITERALLY be a Starscream or Bumblebee figure, except renamed "War Shriek" and "Yellow Stinger" or something.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Hey, that's a nice figure of Megatron HYNKEL. His name's Hynkel.

. . . wow, they really copied the G1 Transformers packaging and artwork, huh?

Ahem. :P

The only cease-and-desists I've heard of is Hasbro sending a C&D to the "MLP Fighting Is Magic" video game, which the creators foolishly took to E3 or Pax (can't remember which.)  At that point Hasbro basically HAD to act, to assert themselves and protect their brand.  (On that note, if any well-meaning person says "You should just ask Hasbro for permission :)", IGNORE THEM.  That is bad advice.  Once you directly bring your activities to Hasbro's attention, they have to act against you to protect their IP.)

The other case I've seen is Hasbro sending C&Ds to a couple G4 plushie makers.  I honestly don't know why they did that, since custom plushie makers hardly seem like a threat to Hasbro's mass produced plushies . . . ?

But anyway, if Hasbro does take exception to your activity, the most that will happen is they'll send you a C&D saying "Hey, stop it."  They aren't going to throw you in jail or anything.

Don't label the stuff you're selling as "My Little Pony" / MLP.  That seems to be a big no-no.  I've never seen a third-party "Transformers" company use the real name (of the brand or the individual robot), even when they're producing something as blatant as this:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Optimus who?  Um, excuse you, that is clearly . . . *squints at box* . . . Prop Sky Pillar.  Duhhhh! :P

However they did describe Sky Prop Pillar as "G1 style" so I guess "G1" is okay?

Final note, I doubt any current Hasbro employees would recognize Li'l Litters as being Hasbro / MLP brand even if they were looking right at them.  The people who worked there in the 80s / early 90s have all retired and the Li'l Litters aren't horses, soooo . . . ;)
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: WingsOfMasquerade on November 18, 2021, 11:26:25 PM
Someone did encounter a trouble once so I wanted to mention
DONT BOX IT and NO PACKAGES
IDK how these TFs are getting away with boxes but I do remember years back someone was doing customs and packaging them in faux-g3 boxes and they got whacked. For whatever reason packaging things attracts a lot of negative attention so just leave the customs loose for safety.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Wardah on November 19, 2021, 12:45:37 PM
It could have been because the packaging imitates Hasbro packaging a bit too much.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 19, 2021, 01:14:28 PM
Someone did encounter a trouble once so I wanted to mention
DONT BOX IT and NO PACKAGES
IDK how these TFs are getting away with boxes but I do remember years back someone was doing customs and packaging them in faux-g3 boxes and they got whacked. For whatever reason packaging things attracts a lot of negative attention so just leave the customs loose for safety.

Wow, that's interesting!  Did they use the MLP logo by chance?

Yes, I often wonder why Hasbro turns such a blind eye to the Transformers third-party companies because it seems like they WOULD be direct competitors to Hasbro's products.  Unless they are just aware that TF fans would be furious if Hasbro moved against them. 

Or maybe it's a way for Hasbro to keep an eye out for new talent with little effort on their part?  Like maybe if they see someone has produced several impressive transforming robots, they offer them a job?  Just speculation on my part.  Transformers require so much engineering compared to most toys.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Carrehz on November 19, 2021, 02:12:46 PM
Huh, first I've heard of packaging being an issue. Unless it used the actual logos/names, then yeah, I could see that being a problem.

Some of the third-party TFs have absolutely gorgeous packaging - I have a couple and just, damn, I haven't seen pretty boxes like that in a LONG time! It wouldn't surprise me if Hasbro scopes out the third-party market and offers some of them jobs, haha. I'm not that deep into TFdom but I have seen some impressive-looking fakes. It definitely seems like more of a threat/competitor market to Hasbro than any MLP stuff out there.

The only cease-and-desists I've heard of is Hasbro sending a C&D to the "MLP Fighting Is Magic" video game, which the creators foolishly took to E3 or Pax (can't remember which.)

THAT'S what got them shut down? Geez, I had no idea. I thought it was common sense to keep stuff like this on the DL and far away from any higher-ups who could see it...! Fangames seem to be the most common thing that companies go after; I've heard about more C&Ds being given to games than anything else.

Didn't know Hasbro had C&D'd some G4 plushie makers, maybe they were really raking it in...? I know a lot of those custom plushies were crazy expensive. Still seems weird though since I was under the impression it was a niche enough market that even if someone did drop a couple hundred dollars on a custom plushie, it wouldn't be happening frequently enough to really worry Hasbro? Weird.

However they did describe Sky Prop Pillar as "G1 style" so I guess "G1" is okay?

I doubt Hasbro have any of the Generation terms copyrighted. "G1 Transformer", "G1 My Little Pony" etc, maybe, but I imagine just "G1", "G2" etc by themselves would be too generic/vague to trademark?
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: tailrustedtealeaf on November 19, 2021, 02:22:36 PM
The only cease-and-desists I've heard of is Hasbro sending a C&D to the "MLP Fighting Is Magic" video game, which the creators foolishly took to E3 or Pax (can't remember which.)  At that point Hasbro basically HAD to act, to assert themselves and protect their brand.  (On that note, if any well-meaning person says "You should just ask Hasbro for permission :)", IGNORE THEM.  That is bad advice.  Once you directly bring your activities to Hasbro's attention, they have to act against you to protect their IP.

I believe a plush maker received a C&D because of their unsavory nature which had reached memetic proportions, apparently a body pillow seller also received one. Other C&Ds were related to digital media, not physical materials. There may be more recent examples related to actual physical touchy things, but these are some I found from poking around.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Leave a Whisper on November 19, 2021, 05:55:28 PM
What kind of name is Hynkel?
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Artemesia's Garden on November 19, 2021, 07:20:40 PM
The only cease-and-desists I've heard of is Hasbro sending a C&D to the "MLP Fighting Is Magic" video game, which the creators foolishly took to E3 or Pax (can't remember which.)  At that point Hasbro basically HAD to act, to assert themselves and protect their brand.  (On that note, if any well-meaning person says "You should just ask Hasbro for permission :)", IGNORE THEM.  That is bad advice.  Once you directly bring your activities to Hasbro's attention, they have to act against you to protect their IP.

I believe a plush maker received a C&D because of their unsavory nature which had reached memetic proportions, apparently a body pillow seller also received one. Other C&Ds were related to digital media, not physical materials. There may be more recent examples related to actual physical touchy things, but these are some I found from poking around.

I agree, that's a bit ick. However, this thread is so interesting. I love all the dreamers creating new G1 ponies.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: aria_elwen on November 20, 2021, 08:41:46 AM
What kind of name is Hynkel?

I'd assume it's a reference to Hynkel from the Chaplin film 'The Great Dictator'. Hynkel was the eponymous dictator based upon Hitler and seeing as Megatron is often called a dictator/conqueror/megalomaniac it's actually quite a suitable name.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: LadyMoondancer on November 20, 2021, 10:53:10 AM
What kind of name is Hynkel?

I'd assume it's a reference to Hynkel from the Chaplin film 'The Great Dictator'. Hynkel was the eponymous dictator based upon Hitler and seeing as Megatron is often called a dictator/conqueror/megalomaniac it's actually quite a suitable name.

OMG, I actually didn't know this--thank you!  I thought it was just a collection of sounds they put together at random!
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Leave a Whisper on November 20, 2021, 12:52:05 PM
What kind of name is Hynkel?

I'd assume it's a reference to Hynkel from the Chaplin film 'The Great Dictator'. Hynkel was the eponymous dictator based upon Hitler and seeing as Megatron is often called a dictator/conqueror/megalomaniac it's actually quite a suitable name.

I did not know that.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: BlackCurtains on November 21, 2021, 05:18:38 AM
Fire Helix does packaging but it doesn't try to imitate Hasbro and it uses his own art. His ponies are insanely popular too.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Cobblestone on December 02, 2021, 09:56:20 AM
Fire Helix does packaging but it doesn't try to imitate Hasbro and it uses his own art. His ponies are insanely popular too.
Damn their work is quite impressive. If I had the extra funds I would try to snap up a few. I love ponies that look like part of the original line (this packaging really gets the g1 vibe too imo).

I’m dying to know where people are coming up with their eye stamps. The look is so crisp.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Strawberry Swirl on December 03, 2021, 09:56:48 AM
Ah I remember Fighting is Magic. Would have been such a cool game, I actually played a demo of it with some friends at a furry con some years back. A shame it never got finished but they did manage an original spiritual successor with character designs by Faust so not all is lost.

WRT plush makers; The person who got C&D'd was making literal thousands on their plushes if memory serves. Their work was understandably ridiculously popular and I was among a fan of theirs. They would put plushes on Ebay and bidding wars ensued. I think they had the word Dove in their name? I wish I could remember for sure, I wonder if some of their plushes are in circulation today...
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: LadyMoondancer on December 03, 2021, 11:18:08 AM
Yeah, the Fighting Is Magic game looked really cool.  I remember Twilight's sprite levitated a book and used it to whack people, lol.  It wasn't gory or anything . . . I think Hasbro would have ignored it if the creators hadn't thrust it into the limelight.
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Shaiyeh on December 03, 2021, 01:58:17 PM
Fire Helix does packaging but it doesn't try to imitate Hasbro and it uses his own art. His ponies are insanely popular too.

I love Fire Helix ponies, they're so good. And the packaging is as you say original :)

Someone did encounter a trouble once so I wanted to mention
DONT BOX IT and NO PACKAGES
IDK how these TFs are getting away with boxes but I do remember years back someone was doing customs and packaging them in faux-g3 boxes and they got whacked. For whatever reason packaging things attracts a lot of negative attention so just leave the customs loose for safety.

This was Aikarin, right? (for anyone looking for a MLP internet nostalgia trip, her site is still up!) I think she did G3 esque packaging while g3 was still going.
I remember I was very inspired by her work when I started customizing and re-did a g3 box for a custom I made for a friend xD Could have been someone else, though, I have to look for my old binder with print-outs of websites' customizing tips & tricks. I'm sure there's a picture of a boxed custom in there.
http://www.aikarin.com/mlp/customs/customgallery.html
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: Crystal-Sushi on December 07, 2021, 03:55:28 AM
Someone did encounter a trouble once so I wanted to mention
DONT BOX IT and NO PACKAGES
IDK how these TFs are getting away with boxes but I do remember years back someone was doing customs and packaging them in faux-g3 boxes and they got whacked. For whatever reason packaging things attracts a lot of negative attention so just leave the customs loose for safety.

Aah that was Aikaren wasn't it?!
Title: Re: Resin Moulds & Hasbro Design Patents
Post by: LadyMoondancer on December 07, 2021, 10:36:44 AM
So in light of this conversation, I found these tweets funny / relevant.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Context:

Starscream, Megatron, Prowl and Optimus are modeled from Hasbro toys or toys licensed by Hasbro (like the Flame Toys model kit).

But MMC Rumble or Frenzy (the blue one) is based on a toy by Mastermind Creations ("Furor" or "Riot"), not licensed by Hasbro.

Devastator (big green robot) is based on Toyworlds "Constructor", also not licensed / made by Hasbro.

I don't know if the artist works full-time for Hasbro, maybe they were just commissioned and had those toys in their collection, but it is pretty funny IMO.  :P
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal