collapse

* Navigation

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 60
  • Dot Hidden: 1
  • Dot Users: 8
  • Dot Users Online:

Author Topic: Unpopular Pony Opinions  (Read 306437 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carrehz

  • #1 Prizestuffer
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • MOC Mimic
  • *****
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Female
  • I'm gonna live forever or die trying!
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2535 on: October 03, 2021, 02:46:23 PM »
No, I'm with LaW on this one, pegasi flight being entirely based on magic is just weird/stupid. Yeah, those wings would be too tiny to allow flight for such a big creature, in real life, but pegasi aren't real to begin with... horses aren't candy-coloured IRL, nor do they interact with all the fantastical things that MLPs do... so it feels silly to me, to draw the line at "But wings don't work that way IRL!" if that makes sense?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Offline NanoRuby

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Prom Queen Sweetheart Sister Pony
  • ***
  • Posts: 269
  • They/Them
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2536 on: October 03, 2021, 03:01:09 PM »
I've always thought of even the more mundande fantastical elements of ponies as being magical as well. So things like being purple and being able to talk are also a result of magic. So magical flight isn't that much of a stretch, at least to me.
Is it Halloween yet?
For Sale/Trade | Wishlist

My awesome avatar was made by Koudoawaia!

Offline Leave a Whisper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Colombian Baby Pony
  • ******
  • Posts: 17667
  • Gender: Female
  • In the Land of Dreams
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2537 on: October 03, 2021, 03:27:58 PM »
Let me clarify, ponies needing "Friendship Magic" to  fly is really stupid. Just as stupid,  as a picture that magically appeared on your hip the moment you found your destiny/career/whatever.

Friendship magic was never needed before. Otherwise G3 pegasus wouldn't have been able to fly, considering they were separated from the other species.

Since the flutter ponies were also secluded from the rest of  dream valley for who knows how long, they would be similarly inconvenienced. Except they weren't.

Flying ponies got wings and instincts,  they can fly just fine.

« Last Edit: October 03, 2021, 07:33:52 PM by Leave a Whisper »
Thanks to TheRockinStallion for my Ponysona Artless

Offline Taffeta

  • Trade Count: (+61)
  • MIB Licensing Show Pinkie Pie
  • ******
  • Posts: 14355
  • Gender: Female
  • UK Pony, Jem and Mediaeval Japanese obsessive :D
    • The My Little Pony Scrapbook
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2538 on: October 03, 2021, 05:36:18 PM »
For me I grew up with the concept that pegasus ponies flew because they had wings, and unicorn and earth ponies flew - sometimes - using magic. Depending on the pony. That's kind of how the comics played it. I never thought about the wing dimensions on the toys. I'm with Carrehz on this, too. I don't need to logically explain how ponies are different colours, have wings, can talk etc because they live in a different world anyway. I just never had any issues with that concept as a kid.

I also basically agree with what LAW said about the G4 stuff. But while I'm riding the unpopular opinion train, I'm  opposed to the idea of popularity clique friendship magic generally. So yeah. :) I guess I have a harder time with some of the G4 concepts anyway, because I also don't like the idea of symbols dictating destiny.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2021, 07:20:26 PM by Taffeta »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
|夏草やつわものどもが夢の跡|

Offline Shystar06

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Mommy & Baby Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 1508
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2539 on: October 04, 2021, 06:13:14 AM »
I also basically agree with what LAW said about the G4 stuff. But while I'm riding the unpopular opinion train, I'm  opposed to the idea of popularity clique friendship magic generally. So yeah. :) I guess I have a harder time with some of the G4 concepts anyway, because I also don't like the idea of symbols dictating destiny.

Honestly, the G4 universe had a couple very disturbing aspects to it with this one being right at the top. The concept of your "mark" heavily dictating your life, potentially including some level of enforcement by the legal system, is frighteningly similar to a human's skin color deciding so many aspects of their life. There are downright ugly implications of the whole cutie mark = job/life system, merely beginning with the chance of getting one that lands you a job you absolutely despise.

Then we take a pegasi-level view of the world of Equestria, beginning with the fact that "the government" (two ruling 'princesses' with their parents/elders never seen)  raise/lower the sun and moon. Meaning the existence of life itself in Equestria depends upon the benevolence of a couple immortal and unelected leaders.

If THAT doesn't make you twitch and go "wait just a minute" then you need to reread the previous two sentences until the full implications sink in. More than a few very well-written fanfics dealt with the consequences for the Equestrian populace, ponies and otherwise, if just one of the pair went completely nuts, got too depressed to do their jobs, tried to seize ultimate power, went MIA one day without explanation, made a mistake, etc. The results of such a situation would instantly jack the show's rating to "R" if accurately shown within an episode or two.

Offline MJNSEIFER

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scribbles Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 1277
  • Gender: Male
  • Brony For All Ponies
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2540 on: October 04, 2021, 11:53:40 AM »
In regards to pegasi flying due to magic... yeah, that's something that doesn't really feel completely right in my opinion either.  I'm actually starting to feel that maybe it should have just been their "super" flying that was caused by magic - like their ability to go unbelievably fast with specifically colored streak as they do, and just have their normal flight be a physical thing?  Like, the overall speed even with their "super" flying can still have a physical side to it, like what determines which pegasi are faster than others, but I'm starting to think that it (and weather manipulation) should be what "Pegasus Magic" is and they should be ably to fly normally, providing they've learned to do so, via physical means.

Regarding cutie marks: I've honestly never felt that cutie marks in G4 outright decided what you did in life or what your job was or anything.  I always felt the show made it clear that a pony could have multiple talents and the cutie mark was just what they're personally good at, and I personally only felt it directly dictated a pony's life if they chose for it to do (or they were a main character whose cutie mark was tied into the big storyline things they've been "chosen" to do) and they ultimately had other options.

I don't think a pony would be driven away from a job just because they had the wrong cutie mark - they'd at least be asked to prove if one of their other talents is whatever the job entails.  I think the fact that some of them have obvious job related ones may just be laziness on the creators' parts (a laziness that I'll probably succumb to as well), like "Oh, I need to create a firefighter pony for one scene... okay, the pony needs a cutie mark, don't they?  Um... well, they're a firefighter, and I don't think I'm ever going to give them a full backstory, so... yeah, the cutie mark can be a hose or something... okay, next scene."

I've also never personally had any reason to believe that a pony would get a cutie mark they completely don't want, be it connected to their job or not, as you'd need to enjoy something at least a decent amount if it was your "special talent" otherwise your heart wouldn't be in it.

I do have a sort of headcanon about the controlling of natural things (mainly the weather and the plants growing, but it could be extended to the raising of the sun and moon), but it's not fully formed, and it probably won't work in my project either (though it does "explain" something about G5 a little...) it's kind of a copout though, so don't get too excited.   ;)

I have to throw in my unpopular opinion that the Royal Sisters are not immortal though (but as there's no right way to view MLP I respect if people want to view them as such - the show have proven they are not, but the show is only one version of MLP and the ultimate version is the one we as individuals choose to see.)

I respect it if people view these things differently, but that is my personal view - I know that I am particularly defensive over cutie marks, so I hope I don't come across like I'm forcing my views on others, as I'm sure it has come across before.
I will confess to being a brony, but I assure you that the things you may not like about them do not apply to me, I mostly keep the fandom name due to nostaligia, but I do genuinely love MLP as a whole, not just FIM, and not just the popularity of FIM - I genuinely love the show (and all the others)

Offline Taffeta

  • Trade Count: (+61)
  • MIB Licensing Show Pinkie Pie
  • ******
  • Posts: 14355
  • Gender: Female
  • UK Pony, Jem and Mediaeval Japanese obsessive :D
    • The My Little Pony Scrapbook
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2541 on: October 04, 2021, 03:34:00 PM »
I am not going to pretend like I have as good a knowledge of G4 as you do, MJSNEIFER, so everything I'm about to say is couched in the disclaimer that this is my impression from the two and a halfish seasons plus odd episodes I have seen of FIM.

I would more associate the CM problem to a class system hierarchy. I don't know how rigid they are, but they are permanent and my impression was that they were a key coming of age event (given the young one and all the flap about them not having them yet). It's almost like they are anticipating them to give them some direction in life. It may be more nuanced but my overall impression (see above disclaimer) is that FIM is a bit bad at joining the dots with their ideas to add nuances. So the nuances are for people to intuit, but they're not canonically explained. And that's where the issues are. It's probably true that BG characters are shoehorned into symbol related jobs - in fairness, MLP Tales also did this at times, I can't say otherwise. The difference is that G1 didn't make a thing about 'getting your rump marking', so the fact that someone might have had a symbol that related to their name/job/interests was kind of just an incidental random thing that happened.

Whether the concept is the problem or the fact FIM doesn't seem to really explain it in a nuanced way I'm not sure. But I just don't really like it.

The race issue in FIM for me is another one completely, it's to do with ponies/other species, as I've mentioned before, Colonialism 101 and the like. Imposing friendship culture on other cultures as 'the best way' is kind of tone deaf, especially in the world we currently inhabit. I didn't like that (speaking as a British person from a nation with a horribly bloody history of colonising the world.)

Again I think this is partly because FIM doesn't explain things well, and broad strokes the idea of friendship being the answer to everything (it's not) and the ponies being great ambassadors of friendship (they're not) instead of recognising where maybe that narrative doesn't fit. Twilight especially, as she is not qualified to be the Princess of Friendship. None of them are, but especially not her. (I mean, Twilight and the pirates in the movie...just...no.).

I like the idea of the magic with pegasus ponies being superspeed and somersaults, although the G1 person inside of me also feels that invalidates Firefly and Whizzer's natural talents. But honestly I'm really sad G5 didn't give magic to earth ponies. It's a UK-centric G1 opinion but it has always felt odd to me that earth ponies haven't been given magic since G1. The most magical pony in G1, according to UK lore, was an Earth Pony. It's a shame this didn't happen in the US lore, because Sunny could have been that pony without having to change her species to conform to type. (Still hope that isn't meant to be permanent, but anyway).

I never really thought about the role of the Princesses, Luna and Celestia. I kind of saw them as quasi-deity figures, rather than dictatorial leaders. But I don't know whether growing up in a state with a monarchy means I have a different view towards the idea of an unelected head of state. But that could become a political discussion, so I'll leave that there. In essence ,I don't know if they are immortal (if they are, then they'd need to be in G5), but I don't see their role as a problem as regards the sun, moon etc. I like less the idea they have a court in equestria and integrate with the ponies and then make Twilight a princess, because for me that blurs the lines of what we're meant to see them as. But that's a different problem.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
|夏草やつわものどもが夢の跡|

Offline brightberry

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Rapunzel Pony
  • *****
  • Posts: 4038
  • Gender: Female
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2542 on: October 04, 2021, 09:00:23 PM »
As a kid, I didn't believe that the pegasis ponies could fly without magic.  G1 ponies are just too big for those tiny wings.  It didn't have to be friendship magic, just regular magic.  But my "canon" was based off the stories on the backcards where the elements, plants and animals could all talk and mountains turned into ice cream.  So... no rules whatsoever aside from "it's magic, don't ask questions"

Offline MJNSEIFER

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scribbles Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 1277
  • Gender: Male
  • Brony For All Ponies
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2543 on: October 21, 2021, 12:19:24 AM »
To Taffeta, I am sorry I took so long to respond to this.

Quote
I am not going to pretend like I have as good a knowledge of G4 as you do, MJSNEIFER, so everything I'm about to say is couched in the disclaimer that this is my impression from the two and a halfish seasons plus odd episodes I have seen of FIM.

Understandable.

Quote
I would more associate the CM problem to a class system hierarchy. I don't know how rigid they are, but they are permanent and my impression was that they were a key coming of age event (given the young one and all the flap about them not having them yet). It's almost like they are anticipating them to give them some direction in life.

I'm not really an expert on class systems, but in my personal headcanon, cutie marks are not a “coming of age event” - they are something that can happen at any age, the same way you can discover what your passion/talent/purpose is at any age in real life.  I have seen opinions of it being this, but that is not my personal headcanon, and I personally view it as being comparable to realising what you want to do in life, but more “magical” and “children's fantasy” than just thinking “Oh hey, I really seem to enjoy writing, don't I?” or something. 

I do agree with it being treated, at least by some ponies, as being something to “give them some direction in life”, but mainly in the same way that a human might not know what to do with their lives if they not only haven't clicked what they're good at, but also what they enjoy doing above all else – I know it's not always as simple as that in real life, but from a children's story perspective, it makes sense that the thing you're best at is also the thing you love doing the most (or one of them) so a lot of the time, it would make sense to me that cutie mark talents are usually what ponies want to do, as well as what they are good at doing and this is the “fantasy” version of them realizing that. 

Yes, it is allowed to be a “destiny” thing in my headcanon/writing, but that's if we're dealing with an important character who is supposed to be at the center of whatever the big storyline is or something.  It's like how I do feel that the Mane Six's cutie marks were at least somewhat destiny, but it's because I feel like their friendship and their connection to the Elements of Harmony was too, and they are all connected in my headcanon/writing. 

Quote
It may be more nuanced but my overall impression (see above disclaimer) is that FIM is a bit bad at joining the dots with their ideas to add nuances. So the nuances are for people to intuit, but they're not canonically explained. And that's where the issues are.

Again understandable – I'll have to check on how I feel about FiM “joining the dots”, but there is a part of me that feels you're right about this be it on cutie marks or other things.  It doesn't matter too much to me, as we are able to fill in these gaps anyway (which at the end of the day makes our own interpretations of cutie marks equally “right”, even if I am somewhat protective of the storyline – so, fair enough.)  The thing is, as I'm sure someone (possibly you, sorry if it wasn't) said, MLP is a toyline franchise, which ultimately means that you are supposed to create your own stories with it, be it playing with toys or (which wasn't exactly intended, I know) writing about it – the canon versions are ultimately a guideline of how to tell the story, and we are “allowed” to include as much canon material as we like (which could even be no canon at all, it's our choice.)   It is also worth noting (as I'm sure you know) that most, if not all, generations usually have at least two canon versions anyway, and G4 is no exception, so at the end of the day, canon is a guideline if anything in My Little Pony and we are free to take as much or as little as we wanted of it in our storylines/play time.

So because of that, I don't mind too much if things aren't explained, because I can just go with my interpretation of it if it fits in to what I'm doing (and if I don't like the actual explanations, or they don't fit in to what I'm doing, I can still go with my version – and so can everyone else with their versions.)

It's probably true that BG characters are shoehorned into symbol related jobs - in fairness, MLP Tales also did this at times, I can't say otherwise. The difference is that G1 didn't make a thing about 'getting your rump marking', so the fact that someone might have had a symbol that related to their name/job/interests was kind of just an incidental random thing that happened.

True, but not too much of a difference for me, as the only real difference for me is that G4 is the first generation where they're actually earned.  I think Tales did deliberately match the symbols with the ponies jobs/interests, but in a different way – the 7 Pony Friends were at times given interests/talents based on their symbols (as were other G1, and other pre-G4 ponies, and not just in the show) so the only real difference is that G4 (and presumably G4.5 and G5) they aren't born with them, and it's specifically talents (in pre-G4, if they mean anything, it could be anything from their job or interest to just matching their name, or even being a random symbol – both of which can also happen in G4, but with the idea that they somehow match the pony's talent as well... just not in an obvious “face value” way.) 

A lot of the time, even in G4 it's probably just “What goes with this pony?”, though G4 could have had moments where they knew what the talent was going to be, so built the cutie mark around that, but may depend if they even knew if that pony was even going to be in the show?  I think they knew the Mane Six would be in the show, obviously, but even their cutie marks could have been designed first, and had their origins, or at least how they connect to the talent the ponies have been given, later on in development.

Quote
Whether the concept is the problem or the fact FIM doesn't seem to really explain it in a nuanced way I'm not sure. But I just don't really like it.

For me personally, it's nuanced enough, but I respect it if you, or anyone else doesn't like the concept.


Quote
The race issue in FIM for me is another one completely, it's to do with ponies/other species, as I've mentioned before, Colonialism 101 and the like. Imposing friendship culture on other cultures as 'the best way' is kind of tone deaf, especially in the world we currently inhabit. I didn't like that (speaking as a British person from a nation with a horribly bloody history of colonising the world.)

Again I think this is partly because FIM doesn't explain things well, and broad strokes the idea of friendship being the answer to everything (it's not) and the ponies being great ambassadors of friendship (they're not) instead of recognising where maybe that narrative doesn't fit. Twilight especially, as she is not qualified to be the Princess of Friendship. None of them are, but especially not her. (I mean, Twilight and the pirates in the movie...just...no.).

I'm not an expert on history, or even how “the world we currently inhabit” links to this (no offence) but I do get what you mean at least to some extent about the ponies essentially forcing their ideals on others.  I remember seeing someone (again, could have been you, sorry if it wasn't) talking about this before, and I do agree that it's not really a good way of doing things – I'm sure it's not meant to come across that way, and obviously friendship needs to be shown as important as it's the theme of the show, but I get you mean about the ponies forcing their way of life on others, and as such this may be one of the aspects of the show, I will choose not to use, at least not in this way (“Friendship is Magic” will still be a theme, though.)  I'm also not particularly sure of the idea that ponies are the only (sentient) species that correctly “understand” friendship and other species need it to be explained to them.

I also get what you mean about friendship not always being the answer, and maybe they could have emphasised its importance without making it seem like the answer to everything, but from a children's show perspective I can at least sort of see why it's done this way, while at the same time seeing why it isn't always a good message, as not everything can be fixed with friendship (apparently, there was supposed to be less redeemed characters than there ended up being), but I understand why they'd give us (or more rather, the target audience) that dream like idea that it could be – I'm sure even at that age they know deep down that it's not true (and if they don't they will at some point), but it's nice believing that a place exists where it is true... even if it's a made up place in a cartoon.

So it can go either way for me, but I do see the flaws in the way it's done, at least in parts of it.

As with the “ambassadors of friendship” thing, I think maybe it's due to the writers giving the Mane Six too much too soon.  It makes sense to at least make the sort of “spokes ponies” for friendship, as it's the Princess of Friendship and her friends, but have it so it's clear they're just starting out, and learning themselves – although I'm ultimately glad we got the School of Friendship despite how silly the idea was (don't the Mane Six have lives of their own?) as I still liked the Student Six/Young Six, it might have been better to have just stopped with the Cutie Map and have that be what is used for promoting friendship (as best as it can be done) for the entire show, with other type of episodes happening as well.  The Mane Six aren't ambassadors of friendship yet, as they're still young, and still learning about friendship themselves, but show enough hints that maybe one day they could be – in the future, when the show is ending.

The same goes with Twilight herself, I can see how she has potential, and would (and in places does) make a great Princess of Friendship, in my opinion, but the show is set while she's still learning, and at times maybe gives her too much too soon, but it makes sense, in my opinion, to imagine that she is better at it in the future, at the end of it all.  Maybe the show seems unsure how to develop the characters or even if they need development at all – the newer episodes seemed to have the characters going through friendship lessons that, even on a bad day, they wouldn't really need to learn by now, so maybe they were just unsure how experienced Twilight was supposed to be?

(I need to check what happened with the pirates.)

Quote
I like the idea of the magic with pegasus ponies being superspeed and somersaults, although the G1 person inside of me also feels that invalidates Firefly and Whizzer's natural talents.
Thank you.  I never mentioned somersaults though, no offence (and there's no way I'd intentionally invalidate anything relating to the first pony I ever liked – which is Firefly in case you don't know and/or are interested.)

Quote
But honestly I'm really sad G5 didn't give magic to earth ponies. It's a UK-centric G1 opinion but it has always felt odd to me that earth ponies haven't been given magic since G1

Maybe G5 did, and we haven't seen it yet?  Also the G4 earth ponies (which are essentially the G5 ponies too) were supposed to have some magic attached, but I don't really know if they followed through with it – they were supposed to a) have a deeper connection to the earth, like with the plants and flowers, but I don't know if they ever really followed through with that (though, Applejack is a farmer, I suppose...) and I've at least heard that they're supposed to be stronger than other ponies, which not only doesn't make exact sense (are all earth ponies automatically strong?  Can a non-earth pony never be stronger than an earth pony no matter how hard they exercise?) the only time I've really seen this portrayed, is with earth ponies who, due to their lifestyle, would be strong anyway – even my friend and I appear to have fallen into this trap with our fanseries; the strongest pony of our Mane Cast is indeed an earth pony, but is job and talent would cause him to get stronger anyway (in one episode, my friend outright said that at least some of his strength came from his job.)  So, yeah FiM didn't really do that well with what earth ponies powers/magic even is, so maybe G5 will either expand on it, or create it's own ideas.


 
Quote
It's a UK-centric G1 opinion but it has always felt odd to me that earth ponies haven't been given magic since G1. The most magical pony in G1, according to UK lore, was an Earth Pony. It's a shame this didn't happen in the US lore, because Sunny could have been that pony without having to change her species to conform to type. (Still hope that isn't meant to be permanent, but anyway).
Wait, who was this G1 Earth Pony?  I'm genuinely interested in hearing this, admittedly just in case it inspires me, but I'm also curious in general.  It is possible that what happened to Sunny in G5 was meant to be a kind of power up than a species change – like she does that when she needs to, or something, but we'll have to see.  It would be interesting to have a version of MLP where earth ponies do have more magic (again) I'm sure, so we'll have to just see what happens (and/or create our own if we get the inspiration to do so.)

Quote
I never really thought about the role of the Princesses, Luna and Celestia. I kind of saw them as quasi-deity figures, rather than dictatorial leaders. But I don't know whether growing up in a state with a monarchy means I have a different view towards the idea of an unelected head of state. But that could become a political discussion, so I'll leave that there. In essence ,I don't know if they are immortal (if they are, then they'd need to be in G5), but I don't see their role as a problem as regards the sun, moon etc. I like less the idea they have a court in equestria and integrate with the ponies and then make Twilight a princess, because for me that blurs the lines of what we're meant to see them as. But that's a different problem.

Ultimately the idea of whether they are immortal or not, can call under headcanon – it's how you choose to view them.  I personally don't think they are, but they are able to live for a long time in their current state (in my headcanon it's the “flowing mane” alicorns that live for centuries) but they are capable of dying, like from an injury or something (which is implied, I felt, during the Season 4 premiere.)  I actually have a headcanon that they give up their longevity (or immortality if that is what they have) once they retire, and that there has even been other sun and moon alicorns before Celestia and Luna.

I also have a headcanon that princess/prince has more than one meaning in Equestria; a pony can be a princess/prince of an actual place (in the Royal Sisters' case, it's Equestria itself), but achieving alicorn  status, they can also be a princess/prince of “something” like the sun/moon or something like love and friendship, and who knows what else?  Obviously they can also be a princess/prince due to marriage and I guess family as well?

Again, I'm sorry I took so long to respond to this, and hope it's okay to do so.
I will confess to being a brony, but I assure you that the things you may not like about them do not apply to me, I mostly keep the fandom name due to nostaligia, but I do genuinely love MLP as a whole, not just FIM, and not just the popularity of FIM - I genuinely love the show (and all the others)

Offline Leave a Whisper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Colombian Baby Pony
  • ******
  • Posts: 17667
  • Gender: Female
  • In the Land of Dreams
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2544 on: October 21, 2021, 03:10:54 PM »
I will not be happy if they give the G5 boys facial hair on the toys. Its so ugly. And some of them have such nice color schemes.
Thanks to TheRockinStallion for my Ponysona Artless

Offline Taffeta

  • Trade Count: (+61)
  • MIB Licensing Show Pinkie Pie
  • ******
  • Posts: 14355
  • Gender: Female
  • UK Pony, Jem and Mediaeval Japanese obsessive :D
    • The My Little Pony Scrapbook
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2545 on: October 28, 2021, 04:55:51 PM »
@MJNSEIFER - I'm going to just touch on a couple of things so we don't continue taking this thread on an unexpected tour of ponyland on its way back on topic but...

I am a historian, it probably influences my reactions to certain things. I do agree in general that MLP is a toy line and I have said that many times, but G4 has a tv show at its core, unlike the generations prior. I have no problem with gaps for nuances unless they create uncomfortable political issues (see Colonialism 101) but because G4 is so show-centric I would expect them to try harder to close those loopholes.

I would disagree that a child's show doesn't need the nuances. If you don't want to teach kids problematic misconceptions then you need to close the story gaps that suggest it.

Onto the G1 question. The pony is Magic Star, as per her fact file entry 1987. Her comic appearances also suggest she can grant wishes and do other things.

http://mylittlewiki.org/wiki/Magic_Star#Backcard_Stories_2

Her US backcard story also suggests she can grant wishes, so I suspect the UK team took that and evolved it.

Of course, with G1, we're all welcome to choose the version we want or make our own, since these several canons don't knit together - but I had the fact file as a 5 year old so that was always my impression.

Bear in mind in the UK Majesty was also extremely magical, so if MS was more magical than Majesty, she had some serious tricks in her spellbook.

I guess making this on topic, my Unpopular Opinion is that I don't see either animated Magic Star, nor So Soft Magic Star, as the 'real' Magic Star ;) I like SS Magic Star, I just can't see her as the same pony I used to write stories about when I was eight or nine :)
« Last Edit: October 28, 2021, 04:59:59 PM by Taffeta »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
|夏草やつわものどもが夢の跡|

Offline brightberry

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Rapunzel Pony
  • *****
  • Posts: 4038
  • Gender: Female
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2546 on: October 28, 2021, 08:11:31 PM »
Magic Star's backcard did make me think she was incredibly powerful.  She gave another pony wings and poured chocolate milk from the Milky Way.  She could probably chose to be a unicorn or alicorn whenever she wanted.  :frolic:   For me, earth ponies were just as powerful as unicorns but it was a different kind of magic for them.  Just as fairy magic and dragon magic might be.

Offline Taffeta

  • Trade Count: (+61)
  • MIB Licensing Show Pinkie Pie
  • ******
  • Posts: 14355
  • Gender: Female
  • UK Pony, Jem and Mediaeval Japanese obsessive :D
    • The My Little Pony Scrapbook
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2547 on: October 28, 2021, 09:34:59 PM »
I think it's sad that a lot of these lovely magical stories about Earth ponies come from the US production canon, yet they just eradicated it for the animation, and even in the audio cassettes I've heard for the US release (the one with Glory, and the Picnic at PE) the magic thing is weirdly handled.

I'm glad the UK did use some of those concepts, and create some of their own, but...yeah. Why should Earth ponies not be powerful? Come on G5. Make Earth ponies actually powerful.

(I actually really love the idea of them being connected to earth, nature, maybe even seasons or weather. What a shame G4 didn't follow that through).
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
|夏草やつわものどもが夢の跡|

Offline MJNSEIFER

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scribbles Pony
  • ****
  • Posts: 1277
  • Gender: Male
  • Brony For All Ponies
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2548 on: October 30, 2021, 04:54:07 PM »
@Taffeta - Thank you for answering, I will try mostly (if not completely) turn the thread back on topic after this.

Quote
I am a historian, it probably influences my reactions to certain things. I do agree in general that MLP is a toy line and I have said that many times, but G4 has a tv show at its core, unlike the generations prior. I have no problem with gaps for nuances unless they create uncomfortable political issues (see Colonialism 101) but because G4 is so show-centric I would expect them to try harder to close those loopholes.
Understandable, it makes sense that ones interests would influence how one sees something at times.  I've basically gotten used to seeing each canon of MLP to be pretty much equal value as each other, and I've had the idea that canon in general doesn't have to be obeyed to the letter, so... I guess that's just how I see things.  I had a lot more to say about this, but I kept going in circles, but it's mostly to do with the fact that (due to starting MLP with the cartoons?) I never really felt that G4s cartoon was any more or less the focus than the previous generation cartoons were, despite MLP being a toyline first.  I honestly can't go any further without rambling and going off topic, so I'll leave it here for now.

Quote
I would disagree that a child's show doesn't need the nuances. If you don't want to teach kids problematic misconceptions then you need to close the story gaps that suggest it.
Agree completely.  I was more focused on the "MLP can be whatever you want it to be" angle, that I missed that I was giving the impression I thought this about children's shows in general - that was not my intention, and I'm sorry.  Children's shows definitely need, and in my experience often have, nuances - I would definitely never write something off as just a children's show or use as reason why you can't take it seriously, or critique it or something (even today, there's kind of an off balance of how seriously children's shows are taken, or how much people allow each other to do so.)  I do agree that you need to be careful you're not giving the kids - the target audience - the wrong message, especially (as I didn't consider before) they might not even know or be thinking of the fact that you don't need to obey canon, they might not even know what "canon" is at that age so the show might be the only version for some (although obviously some kids could just play with the toys independently from the show), but yeah... you are right to say the message has to spread correctly, so thanks for pointing that out.

Quote
Onto the G1 question. The pony is Magic Star, as per her fact file entry 1987. Her comic appearances also suggest she can grant wishes and do other things.

http://mylittlewiki.org/wiki/Magic_Star#Backcard_Stories_2

Her US backcard story also suggests she can grant wishes, so I suspect the UK team took that and evolved it.
Oh yes, Magic Star!  I saw that about her when I checked her out for research a while ago, I'm sure (my research basically consisted of; that very page you linked me to)  It's just one fanseries of course, but it would be cool if I could somehow find a way to incorporate the magical earth pony side to her character in my project, if I can (I already know that I'm including her at some point...)  I'll try to see if I can find some of her comic book appearances too, basically see which "Magic Star" inspires me and/or fits in to the storyline (but it would be cool if I could do what I said it would be cool to do.)

Quote
Of course, with G1, we're all welcome to choose the version we want or make our own, since these several canons don't knit together - but I had the fact file as a 5 year old so that was always my impression.
Not just G1, that's pretty much how it is with all generations, but in short I do agree that we can choose as much or as little as we want from all canons, that's pretty much what I was saying throughout the conversation, but I guess it got lost in the babble, sorry about that.

Quote
(I actually really love the idea of them being connected to earth, nature, maybe even seasons or weather. What a shame G4 didn't follow that through).
Yeah, it is shame this never really went anywhere, again it's only one fanmade version, but I'll see if I can expand on that (thanks for mentioning seasons, I'll see if I can do something with that - weather is harder, because the pegasi have kind of stuck their flag in that, but... you never know; the only limited to storytelling is our own imagination, of course.)

Again, I'll try to be at least mostly on topic now.
I will confess to being a brony, but I assure you that the things you may not like about them do not apply to me, I mostly keep the fandom name due to nostaligia, but I do genuinely love MLP as a whole, not just FIM, and not just the popularity of FIM - I genuinely love the show (and all the others)

Offline Cobblestone

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Colorswirl Pony
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
  • Gender: Female
Re: Unpopular Pony Opinions
« Reply #2549 on: November 11, 2021, 02:06:00 AM »
Let's see...

I like flocked ponies. I know they can be disasters if they're not taken care of but something about them works for me. I'd love to try making my own someday.

I don't care for the sister style bodies (are we still calling them that?) The longer legs just make me think of other toy lines.

Don't care for G4. It's not for me. I pretty much exist in G1 world though a few g2s and g3s are appealing to me.

Wish I could say I don't get the hype for certain ponies but I REALLY want Icy Crystal haha I know mimic is always fluxing price wise. Not sure who else is coveted RN aside from Punz (though I know a lot of people don't care for her anymore)

I'm excited about the idea of new classic style ponies although I'm not sure yet how I feel about reproducing the old ones. I can see this causing issues with honesty during sales and I'd much rather see new fun ideas. The old line was limited by what they thought was marketable to little girls at the time but now there's a chance to expand since I think G1 is largely older fans or younger people who picked it up from older fans etc.

Probably not unpopular but I don't like the hard plastic types of toys that are super popular right now will all kinds of toy lines.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
On a quest for breyer dapples

 

SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal